ArticleScientific reports2025
Use of a BMI-independent biomarker-based prostate cancer risk score to identify and triage individuals at risk of prostate disease.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most common cause of cancer related deaths in men in the UK. A national screening programme for PCa does not exist due to the unsuitability of the total prostate specific antigen (tPSA) test which is not specific for PCa and has a high false positive rate. Serum tPSA was measured in n = 25,356 male Randox Health clients. A biomarker-based (tPSA, EGF, MCP-1, IL-8) prostate cancer risk score (PCRS) was then applied to a retrospective cohort (n = 1,142/25,356) of individuals to assess PCa risk. A comparative analysis between tPSA and PCRS indicated that 90.5% of the cohort were assigned low risk of PCa. Of those with an elevated PCRS, 67.8% (78/115) had a normal tPSA value based on tPSA age-adjusted cut-offs. In addition, we observed a significant negative correlation between increasing body mass index (BMI) in men with high BMI (≥ 30) and tPSA levels. No correlation was observed between BMI and PCRS. The tPSA test is potentially unsuitable for use in males with BMI ≥ 30. Use of PCRS could provide more accurate PCa risk stratification for males with BMI ≥ 30. Future assessment of the clinical utility of PCRS is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.