Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40702106›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of cancer2025

T cell engagers: expanding horizons in oncology and beyond.

Gulsah Albayrak, Peter Kok-Ting Wan, Kerry Fisher, Leonard W Seymour

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Preclinical Characterization of CLSP-1025, a First-in-Class, Mutation-Specific T-Cell Engager Targeting a Neoantigen Derived from a Common p53 Mutation.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Dermatologic Adverse Events Associated with T-Cell Engager Therapy.American journal of clinical dermatology · 2026
    Review
  16. Recombinant Protein Drugs: A 2025 Update.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2026
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gulsah Albayrak *Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. gulsah.albayrak@oncology.ox.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9106-5798
Peter Kok-Ting Wan *Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0414-5453
Kerry FisherDepartment of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Leonard W SeymourDepartment of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3825-0841

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

introductionT cell engagers (TCEs) are engineered immunotherapeutic molecules designed to direct the body's immune system against tumour or infected cells by bridging T cells and their targets, triggering potent cytotoxic responses. Over the past decade, TCE-based therapies have gained momentum in oncology, resulting in several FDA approvals for haematologic malignancies and showing growing promise in solid tumours.

objectiveThis review elaborates on TCE mechanisms of action, emphasising their ability to activate T cells, target tumour antigens, and modulate the tumour microenvironment. METHODS/

resultsWe also delve into the clinical outcomes demonstrating TCE efficacy, alongside challenges such as cytokine release syndrome, antigen heterogeneity, and short half-lives. Recent advances in TCE design have incorporated multispecific constructs and conditional activation strategies and expansion in target molecules has enabled broadening applications to non-oncology indications like autoimmune and infectious diseases. Moreover, the use of artificial intelligence (AI) has also accelerated TCE discovery by identifying favourable epitope interactions, reducing immunogenicity risks, and enhancing overall design efficiency.

conclusionsLooking further, these advances open up a new era to redefine success for TCEs in both cancer and beyond, offering hope for more effective, safer immunotherapies.

Indexed as

ImmunotherapyNeoplasmsT-LymphocytesAntigens, NeoplasmHumansTumor MicroenvironmentAntigens, Neoplasm

Identifiers

PMID40702106
PMCPMC12572156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.