ArticleScientific reports2025
Wear characteristics of armature surface and its thermal effects under different electromagnetic launch conditions.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The surface wear characteristics of the armature passing through the rail are crucial as they relate to the quality of electromagnetic launch and the lifespan of the device. Charging voltage and initial surface roughness are significant factors influencing wear behavior. It is urgent to clarify the evolution of armature wear patterns and fundamentally suppressing material damage. Therefore, in this paper, an electromagnetic railgun experimental platform was established. LSCM measurement, SEM and EDS detection were performed on the surface of the post-launch armature, and the wear mechanism was analyzed in conjunction with the thermal effects and changes in contact resistance. The results show that as the charging voltage increases, the armature transitions from abrasive wear to oxidative wear and fatigue wear. For this work, the optimal charging voltage is 2100 V, with a wear rate of 0.38% and wear roughness of 8.46 μm. As the initial surface roughness decreases, abrasive wear, oxidative wear, and adhesive wear occur sequentially. The optimal initial roughness range is 0.55-1.05 μm, with a wear rate of 0.21-0.25% and wear roughness of 7.91-8.31 μm. During this process, both Joule heat and frictional heat continuously increase, with the former increasing more rapidly. There is an initial relatively large value of contact resistance, which fluctuates smoothly, and experiences a sharp increase when the armature exits the barrel, indicating the armature wear caused by the action of transition arc. Finally, a numerical model for armature wear is proposed, along with optimization directions for armature design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.