ArticleScientific reports2025
A comparative study of femtosecond pulsed and continuous wave lasers on physiological responses through activation of phytochromes in seeds.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Red light activates phytochrome photoreceptors, which mediate such key developmental steps as germination and seedling photomorphogenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. To examine the details of these responses, we developed a novel experimental system and demonstrated that brief, high-intensity light pulses can elicit sustained physiological responses. We observed that the seeds responded to the femtosecond laser light pulses, but with lower sensitivity compared with continuous light sources having the same average fluence. We concluded that (i) phytochrome B photoreceptors within imbibed seeds efficiently absorb red and far-red photons from pulsed femtosecond laser pulses, with absorption occurring during approximately 10 orders of magnitude shorter amount of time than with conventional light sources; (ii) these treatments did not induce adverse effects during later plant development; and (iii) the effect of ultrashort light pulses in planta coincides with phytochrome photoconversion characteristics described during in vitro studies. Our findings demonstrate that seed germination and photomorphogenic development can be effectively triggered by light, regardless of whether it is delivered continuously or within extremely brief pulses. This research expands the potential applications of femtosecond laser technology and demonstrates the feasibility of investigating the effects of ultrafast physical phenomena on biological processes in vivo using diverse biological readouts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.