Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40702042›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Gait instability is a more specific predictor of corticospinal tract function than gait speed in clinically stable multiple sclerosis.

Furkan Bilek, Arthur R Chaves, Oleksandr Fesenko, Michelle Ploughman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Furkan BilekRecovery and Performance Laboratory, Division of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1567-7201
Arthur R ChavesUniversity of Ottawa's The Royal Institute for Mental Health Research, Ottawa, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3940-5980
Oleksandr FesenkoRecovery and Performance Laboratory, Division of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5224-9655
Michelle PloughmanRecovery and Performance Laboratory, Division of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL, Canada. mploughm@mun.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4594-0077

Funding

Canada Research Chairs 2019-00290CIHR 173526Scientific and Technological Research Council of Türkiye 1059B192300126
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis (MS) research requires new, more sensitive, behavioral biomarkers that map to subtle central nervous system injury. Although gait speed, as measured using the Timed 25 Foot Walk Test, is used clinically to track MS progression, it is less useful in people with MS who do not have overt gait impairment. This study aimed to identify specific spatiotemporal gait parameters that predict corticospinal tract (CST) function in individuals with MS. We recruited consecutive patients attending a neurology clinic and evaluated CST excitatory and inhibitory function using single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation of the primary motor cortex representation of the first dorsal interosseous muscle. We generated excitatory and inhibitory recruitment curves by calculating the area under the curve for motor-evoked potential amplitudes and cortical silent period durations, respectively, across stimulation intensities from 105 to 155% of active motor threshold in 10% increments. Spatiotemporal gait parameters were assessed using an electronic walkway. We built predictive models with gait parameters as the predictors and CST function as the outcome. We evaluated 78 individuals with MS (58 females). Longer distance of the center of pressure movement during single support was the strongest predictor of higher excitability (lower active motor threshold; accounting for 25.8% of variance, R² = 0.258), while less time in double support accounted for a smaller portion of variability in excitatory recruitment curve (13.3% variance explained, R² = 0.133). For inhibitory CST function, slower stride time (30.5% variance explained, R² = 0.305) and wider stride (6.3% variance explained, R² = 0.063) predicted greater inhibition. Notably, in all models, measures of gait stability, not gait speed, predicted CST function. Our results suggest that even among people with MS who have normal gait speed and can easily cross an urban intersection, subtle postural control impairments exist which may not be apparent to them or to their clinician.

Indexed as

GaitGait Disorders, NeurologicMultiple SclerosisPyramidal TractsWalking SpeedAdultEvoked Potentials, MotorFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotor CortexTranscranial Magnetic StimulationCorticospinal tractGait speedGait stabilityMultiple sclerosisNeurodegenerative diseaseSpatiotemporalTranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID40702042
PMCPMC12287266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.