ArticleScientific reports2025
Microstructural evolution and mechanical property enhancement of red mud incorporated high strength concrete.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigates the effects of red mud (RM) incorporation on high-strength concrete through comprehensive assessment of mechanical properties, microstructural characteristics, and phase evolution over 180 days. Five concrete mixtures with RM replacement levels ranging from 0 to 20% were analyzed. Results demonstrate that 10% RM replacement achieves superior performance with 28.96%, 13.66%, and 15.45% improvements in compressive, split tensile, and flexural strengths respectively at 180 days. X-ray diffraction analysis reveals significant mineralogical transformation in this mixture, with progressive reduction in portlandite content and increased formation of strength-contributing phases. Scanning electron microscopy confirms enhanced matrix densification and improved interfacial transition zone characteristics, while Energy Dispersive X-ray analysis shows a favorable Ca/Si ratio of 0.9475 at 180 days, indicating formation of stable C-S-H gel structures. Novel prediction models for mechanical properties demonstrate greater accuracy compared to established code equations. This research establishes 10% as the most effective RM replacement threshold, balancing enhanced mechanical performance with sustainability benefits, thereby providing a robust framework for industrial-scale implementation of RM in high-strength concrete applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.