Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40702037›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Optimising offshore multiphase flowmeter technology to improve wet gas field efficiency.

Rahimi Zaman Jusoh A Rashid, MFaizal Mustafa, Idris Ismail, Nur Azlina Mohamed Mokmin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rahimi Zaman Jusoh A RashidDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, 32610, Seri Iskandar, Perak, Malaysia.
MFaizal MustafaDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, 32610, Seri Iskandar, Perak, Malaysia.
Idris IsmailDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, 32610, Seri Iskandar, Perak, Malaysia.
Nur Azlina Mohamed MokminCentre for Instructional Technology and Multimedia, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800, Gelugur, Malaysia. nurazlina@usm.my.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to assess how well Multiphase Flowmeters (MPFMs) can improve the efficiency of offshore wet gas fields, especially when the GVF is high. Extensive testing revealed that MPFMs outperformed conventional wet gas meters in terms of measurement accuracy and dependability, particularly in typically unmanned facilities (NUFs); for instance, MPFMs achieved 100% accuracy in gas volumetric flowrate measurements across 13 blind test points compared to the reference standards, while traditional meters often fall short under high GVF conditions. The findings demonstrate that MPFMs' compatibility with lightweight constructions and capacity to manage high GVF scenarios significantly reduce operating costs and infrastructure needs. This research has proven the technological developments in MPFM design, such as improvements in sensor technology, data processing algorithms, and materials engineering. These developments maximize operational effectiveness and resource management by ensuring accurate flow measurements. The study emphasizes how MPFMs are better for the environment since they reduce the need for extensive separation facilities, which results in smaller and more affordable offshore platforms. The results highlight the importance of innovating and using MPFMs in the real world to support effective and sustainable oil and gas extraction procedures.

Indexed as

High GVFMeasurementMultiphase flowmeterNormally unmanned facilityWet gas meter

Identifiers

PMID40702037
PMCPMC12287291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.