ArticleScientific reports2025
Validation of the de Morton Mobility Index for measuring mobility related activities in Hungarian institutionalized older adults.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In old age, decline in mobility has a significant impact on performing activities of daily living, participating in society, and on quality of life. Mobility changes should be measured and monitored using measures with appropriate psychometric properties. The psychometrically sound de Morton Mobility Index (DEMMI) assesses a broad range of mobility related activities. The aim of this study was to develop a valid and reliable, cross-culturally adapted Hungarian version of the DEMMI scale (HU-DEMMI) among institutionalized older people. Development of the HU-DEMMI was conducted using a cross-sectional study design with an overall of 170 participants. Validity was tested via construct (established by hypothesis testing) and structural validity (explored with structural equation modeling (SEM)). Reliability was assessed using three measurement properties: internal consistency (determined by Cronbach's alpha), test-retest reliability (by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC)), and measurement error (standard error of measurement (SEM), minimally detectable change (MDC), limits of agreement (LoA)). Linguistic and cultural adaptation was realized successfully. As for construct validity, the HU-DEMMI showed a strong correlation with mobility related measures and a weak correlation with non-mobility measure. Significant differences in the DEMMI score were found across groups being at various levels of assistive device use. Internal consistency by Cronbach's alpha was 0.906; the dimensionality testing revealed no violation of unidimensionality. However, a three-dimensional structure uncovered a better fit. The inter- and intra-rater ICC of DEMMI scores were 0.981 and 0.989, respectively. The SEM for inter-rater reliability test was 2.924 and the MDC
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.