Trial reportScientific reports2025
A randomized comparative feasibility study of neuromodulation and cognitive training for post-COVID fatigue.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05753202 (Neuromodulation Using Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neuromodulation Using Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in Post-COVID Syndrome: Comparison of Two Targets
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microtesla magnetic therapy for cognitive impairment in long COVID: a randomized pilot study.Brain communications · 2026Article
- Transcranial stimulation as a possible therapeutic proposal in long COVID.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fatigue and cognitive deficits are common and disabling symptoms in patients experiencing post-COVID condition. This randomized parallel study aimed to evaluate the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the primary motor cortex combined with cognitive training (M1 + CT), compared to tDCS over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex with cognitive training (DLPFC + CT), on fatigue, cognition, and other clinical symptoms in post-COVID. Sixty-three patients completed the treatment (n = 32 in the M1 + CT group and n = 31 in the DLPFC + CT group) with a mean age of 47 years and an average symptom duration of 32 months. Both groups underwent comprehensive neuropsychological and clinical evaluations, including ecological momentary assessments of fatigue, at baseline, post-treatment, and one-month follow-up. The Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) was used as the primary endpoint. Patients were randomly assigned to the M1 + CT or DLPFC + CT groups and received 15 sessions of tDCS administered concurrently with adaptive CT. The M1 + CT group showed a slightly higher efficacy in reducing fatigue and improving sleep quality than the DLPFC + CT group. Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in cognition, anxiety, depression, pain, and sleep quality. These improvements were sustained over time. These findings indicate that tDCS combined with cognitive training is a feasible, safe, and effective approach for reducing fatigue and enhancing cognition in post-COVID patients. The results highlight the potential of brain stimulation and cognitive training to alleviate fatigue and cognitive impairment in post-COVID, warranting further confirmation through additional randomized controlled trials.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05753202.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.