Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40702022›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2025

A randomized comparative feasibility study of neuromodulation and cognitive training for post-COVID fatigue.

Silvia Oliver-Mas, Jordi A Matias-Guiu, Cristina Delgado-Alonso, Lidia Gil-Martínez, Constanza Cuevas, Carmen Polidura, Lucía Fernández-Romero, Andreu Matias-Guiu, Natividad Gómez-Ruiz, María José Gil-Moreno and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05753202 (Neuromodulation Using Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05753202 naunknown statusnot on this map

Neuromodulation Using Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in Post-COVID Syndrome: Comparison of Two Targets

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital San Carlos, MadridRan2023 to 2024Enrolled40ConditionsCOVID-19, Post-COVID-19 Syndrome, Post COVID-19 ConditionArmstranscranial current direct stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Silvia Oliver-MasDepartment of Neurology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, "San Carlos" Health Research Institute (IdISCC), Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Jordi A Matias-GuiuDepartment of Neurology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, "San Carlos" Health Research Institute (IdISCC), Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain. jordimatiasguiu@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5520-2708
Cristina Delgado-AlonsoDepartment of Neurology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, "San Carlos" Health Research Institute (IdISCC), Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Lidia Gil-MartínezDepartment of Radiology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, San Carlos Health Research Institute (IdISCC), Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Constanza CuevasDepartment of Neurology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, "San Carlos" Health Research Institute (IdISCC), Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Carmen PoliduraDepartment of Radiology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, San Carlos Health Research Institute (IdISCC), Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Lucía Fernández-RomeroDepartment of Neurology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, "San Carlos" Health Research Institute (IdISCC), Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Andreu Matias-GuiuDepartment of Neurology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, "San Carlos" Health Research Institute (IdISCC), Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Natividad Gómez-RuizDepartment of Radiology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, San Carlos Health Research Institute (IdISCC), Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
María José Gil-MorenoDepartment of Neurology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, "San Carlos" Health Research Institute (IdISCC), Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Miguel Yus-FuertesDepartment of Radiology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, San Carlos Health Research Institute (IdISCC), Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Jorge Matias-GuiuDepartment of Neurology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, "San Carlos" Health Research Institute (IdISCC), Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Maria Diez-CirardaDepartment of Neurology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, "San Carlos" Health Research Institute (IdISCC), Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain. maria.diecirarda@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6768-189X

Funding

Department of Health, Community of Madrid FIBHCSC 2020 COVID-19Fundación para el Conocimiento madri+d G63-HEALTHSTARPLUS-HSP4Instituto de Salud Carlos III CD22/00043Instituto de Salud Carlos III INT20/00079
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fatigue and cognitive deficits are common and disabling symptoms in patients experiencing post-COVID condition. This randomized parallel study aimed to evaluate the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the primary motor cortex combined with cognitive training (M1 + CT), compared to tDCS over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex with cognitive training (DLPFC + CT), on fatigue, cognition, and other clinical symptoms in post-COVID. Sixty-three patients completed the treatment (n = 32 in the M1 + CT group and n = 31 in the DLPFC + CT group) with a mean age of 47 years and an average symptom duration of 32 months. Both groups underwent comprehensive neuropsychological and clinical evaluations, including ecological momentary assessments of fatigue, at baseline, post-treatment, and one-month follow-up. The Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) was used as the primary endpoint. Patients were randomly assigned to the M1 + CT or DLPFC + CT groups and received 15 sessions of tDCS administered concurrently with adaptive CT. The M1 + CT group showed a slightly higher efficacy in reducing fatigue and improving sleep quality than the DLPFC + CT group. Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in cognition, anxiety, depression, pain, and sleep quality. These improvements were sustained over time. These findings indicate that tDCS combined with cognitive training is a feasible, safe, and effective approach for reducing fatigue and enhancing cognition in post-COVID patients. The results highlight the potential of brain stimulation and cognitive training to alleviate fatigue and cognitive impairment in post-COVID, warranting further confirmation through additional randomized controlled trials.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05753202.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyCOVID-19FatigueTranscranial Direct Current StimulationAdultCognitionCognitive TrainingDorsolateral Prefrontal CortexFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotor CortexSARS-CoV-2Treatment OutcomeCognitive trainingFatigueNeuromodulationPost-COVID conditiontDCS

Identifiers

PMID40702022
PMCPMC12287385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.