ArticleScientific reports2025
A hybrid approach combining Bayesian networks and logistic regression for enhancing risk assessment.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study enhances cybersecurity risk assessment by integrating Bayesian Networks (BN) and Logistic Regression (LR) models, using data from the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. First, a probabilistic causal model is built as a BN to capture complex interdependencies among vulnerability characteristics such as CVSS score, exploit complexity, and attack vector. Conditional probabilities of exploitation are calculated, providing a nuanced, evidence-based understanding of each factor's contribution to risk. Second, these posterior probabilities serve as input features for an LR classifier, combining the BN's dependency structure with LR's discriminative power to predict vulnerability risk levels. Parameter estimation employs maximum likelihood methods, supplemented by expert knowledge where data are sparse. When applied to 775 vulnerability records, the BN-LR hybrid achieves an accuracy rate of 97% and a ROC-AUC of 0.1 on the held-out test set, outperforming both standalone BN (accuracy 86.7%, AUC 0.89) and standalone LR (accuracy 88.1%, AUC 0.90). Sensitivity analysis further highlights that CVSS score and exploit complexity carry the greatest influence on risk predictions. By quantifying both causal relationships and classification boundaries, the integrated model not only improves predictive performance but also offers clear insights into which attributes most strongly drive potential exploits. This practical tool thus enables security teams to prioritize remediation efforts effectively, strengthening organizational vulnerability management and overall security posture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.