ArticleScientific data2025
A highly annotated drug combination resource for catalyzing precision combinatorial therapy.
Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- WTAP-Mediated mAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- A Knowledge Graph Approach To Discovering Drug Combination Therapies Across The Phenome.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2026Article
- The Rise of Generalist Foundation Models and Quantum Computing in Oncology.Technology in cancer research & treatmentReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Combinations of cancer drugs have the potential to overcome resistance, improve the response rate of existing drugs and reduce dose-limiting toxicity associated with single agents. Existing drug combination databases only provide response data, such as synergy scores between two drugs, without important contextual information to assist oncologists in matching their patients with these combinations in an evidence-based way. To address this gap, we developed a cancer drug combination database (named as OncoDrug+) by manually collecting and integrating drug combinations and corresponding evidences from FDA databases, clinical guidelines, clinical trials, clinical case reports, patient-derived tumor xenograft models, cell line models and bioinformatics predictions. OncoDrug+ includes 7895 data entries, covering 77 cancer types, including unique 2201 drug combination therapies, involving 1200 biomarkers, 763 published reports and seven types of evidence. Unlike many previous databases only include treatment regime and drug response data, OncoDrug+ provides detailed genetic evidences, pharmacological target information and evidence scores supporting each combination strategy, making evidence-based experimental or clinical applications of cancer drug combinations be possible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.