ArticlePsycho-oncology2025
The Association Between Psychosocial Factors and Decision Making Regarding Primary Treatment in Older Women With Early-Stage Breast Cancer.
Article in Psycho-oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBreast cancer is increasingly prevalent among older adults, who are likely to have numerous comorbidities and unique psychosocial challenges.
aimsThe aim of this study was to measure the prevalence of psychosocial factors in a cohort of older women diagnosed with early-stage operable breast cancer and the influence these factors may have on treatment decisions.
methodsAs part of a prospective study in three UK centres, 199 patients with a new diagnosis of early-stage operable primary breast cancer, aged ≥ 70 years (mean 77, range 68-93) were recruited. A cancer-specific Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) was conducted within 6 weeks of diagnosis. Association between treatment decision and psychosocial aspects (as measured by the 'psychosocial support', 'social activity' and 'social support' domains) of the CGA was determined. Treatment decision was not guided by this study and was determined usual conventional methods as per the breast multi-disciplinary team.
resultsScores for 'psychosocial support' averaged 82.1/102, 'social activity' averaged 13.5/24, and 'social support' averaged 43.3/72; with a higher score indicating a more positive outcome. There was no association between total scores in these domains and the type of treatment received. A lower score in three individual questions was associated with a higher likelihood of non-surgical treatment.
conclusionsWhile no direct link emerged between overall psychosocial scores and treatment decisions using CGA, specific sub-questions displayed associations with non-surgical treatment. This study is the only one of its kind to our knowledge. This may have implications for the design of a pre-CGA screening tool.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.