ArticleOsong public health and research perspectives2025
Deep learning-based prognosis of major adverse cardiac events in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a retrospective observational study in the Republic of Korea.
Article in Osong public health and research perspectives, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence and biohealth: the Republic of Korea's emerging priorities in health care R&D.Osong public health and research perspectives · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis study developed deep neural network (DNN) models capable of accurately classifying major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) after hospital discharge, across 3 follow-up intervals: 1, 6, and 12 months.
methodsDNN models were constructed to predict post-discharge MACE across 4 categories. Multiple traditional machine learning models were implemented as controls to benchmark the performance of our DNN approach. All models were evaluated based on their ability to predict MACE occurrence during the specified follow-up periods.
resultsThe DNN models demonstrated superior predictive performance over conventional machine learning methods, achieving high accuracies of 0.922, 0.884, and 0.913 for the 1-month, 6-month, and 12-month follow-up periods, respectively.
conclusionThe high accuracy of our DNN models highlights their practical advantages for AMI diagnosis and guidance of follow-up treatment. These models can serve as valuable decision support tools, enabling clinicians to optimize the overall management of AMI patients and potentially enhance their hospitalization experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.