ArticleBJGP open2026
GPs' perspectives regarding suicide prevention: a systematic scoping review.
Article in BJGP open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSuicide is a major public health issue. More than one third of patients will visit their GP in the month leading up to a suicide attempt, thus highlighting the key role GPs play in suicide prevention.
aimTo explore the qualitative research on GPs' perspectives of suicide prevention in primary care. DESIGN &
settingA systematic scoping review of qualitative studies relating to the research question.
methodThis review is reported in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidance. Articles at full-text review were assessed for inclusion in the study against eligibility criteria (English language, qualitative research, focus on GPs' perspectives of suicide prevention). Data were extracted using a standardised form and a thematic synthesis approach was used to describe the themes elicited from the studies.
resultsIn total, 2210 abstracts were screened. Twelve studies from seven countries were included at full-text review. The following four main themes were elicited: challenges to managing suicidal behaviour; fragmented relationships with mental health services; personal attitudes of GPs regarding suicidal behaviour; and identified needs to improve suicide prevention in primary care.
conclusionUnderstanding GPs' perspectives can lead to improved training, resources, and support for primary care professionals, who are frontline providers of mental health care. This scoping review suggested there is a lack of evidence around what approaches GPs find effective in managing suicidality and how relationships can be strengthened with mental health services to deliver person-centred integrated care for those identified at risk of suicide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.