ArticleAnnals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery2025
The contribution of surgical data science to identifying intraoperative human errors and adverse events in elective liver surgery: A preliminary study.
Article in Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Backgrounds/Aims: Surgical data science (SDS) is an emerging discipline that aims to enhance the quality of interventional healthcare by capturing and analyzing intraoperative data. Our study focused on identifying human errors (HEs) and adverse events (AEs) during elective liver surgery using an SDS-based approach. Methods: Intraoperative data from 15 patients undergoing elective open liver resection were collected using an operating room data system (audio, room, and operative field videos) over a 6-month period in a tertiary hepatobiliary surgical center. Two independent researchers analyzed the data to identify HEs and AEs according to two distinct classifications. Results: A total of 154 HEs (median number per intervention: 7) and 42 AEs (33 minor, 9 major) were identified. All except one major AE were associated with HEs, while 15 minor AEs had no identifiable underlying HEs. The type of HEs significantly varied depending on the presence or absence of AEs. The majority of HEs (n = 128, 83.1%), which did not result in any AEs, primarily involved lapses in attention, whereas approximately half of the AEs were linked to failures in recognition. Conclusions: This preliminary study indicates that failures in recognition were frequently associated with major AEs during elective liver resection, as per the SDS approach. Larger multicenter studies are necessary to confirm these findings and develop preventive strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.