ReviewAmerican journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists2025
Treatment of Actinomyces europaeus and Clostridium innocuum necrotizing fasciitis: Case report and literature review.
Review in American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Necrotizing fasciitis caused by Actinomyces europaeus: a case report and literature review.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Review
- Case Report: Fournier's gangrene caused byFrontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeActinomyces europaeus and Clostridium innocuum are rare causes of necrotizing fasciitis. For both organisms, it is necessary to know the specific species because variations in antibiotic sensitivity exist, making treatment challenging. SUMMARY: An 86-year-old white female presented to the emergency department with severe pain in her right thigh. A computed tomography scan showed pockets of gas and edema in the subcutaneous tissue extending from the right lateral hemipelvis to the right inguinal area and proximal thigh. Her LRINEC (Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis) score was 7. The patient was started on intravenous vancomycin, piperacillin/tazobactam, and clindamycin and brought to the operating room for debridement. Anaerobic cultures grew Bacteroides fragilis, Bacteroides uniformis, and C. innocuum. Aerobic cultures were positive for Actinomyces. The laboratory was called to determine the species of Actinomyces and reported A. europaeus. The patient's antibiotics were tailored to meropenem 2 g intravenously every 8 hours and linezolid 600 mg intravenously every 12 hours. The organisms were sent to a reference laboratory for sensitivity testing. Interpretation of sensitivity data and treatment recommendations including duration of therapy are discussed.
conclusionIt is important to rapidly identify the species for both Actinomyces and Clostridium infections and obtain sensitivity values to help ensure proper therapy is given. Interpretation of minimum inhibitory concentrations is difficult without established breakpoints. Piperacillin/tazobactam resistance has been reported for A. europaeus, while vancomycin resistance has been reported for C. innocuum. For Actinomyces infections, duration of therapy should be individualized and can range from 14 days to 1 year based on patient response and the species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.