Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40701603›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2025

Pain management and patient education interventions to increase physical activity in people with intermittent claudication (PrEPAID): a feasibility randomised controlled trial in the UK.

Chris Seenan, Ukachukwu Abaraogu, Philippa Margaret Dall, Lesley Gilmour, Garry Tew, Wesley Stuart, Andrew Elders, Julie Brittenden

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03204825 (Pain Management and Patient Education for Physical Activity in Intermittent Claudication), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03204825 nacompletednot on this map

Pain Management and Patient Education for Physical Activity in Intermittent Claudication (PrEPAID): Feasibility Randomised Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorGlasgow Caledonian UniversityRan2017 to 2020Enrolled95ConditionsPeripheral Arterial Disease, Intermittent ClaudicationArmsActive TENS, Patient-Centred Education, Placebo TENS
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Chris SeenanFaculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK christopher.seenan@stir.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4379-7913
Ukachukwu AbaraoguInstitute for Applied Social and Health Research, University of the West of Scotland, Paisley, Scotland, UK.
Philippa Margaret DallSchool of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Lesley GilmourNHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
Garry TewInstitute for Health and Care Improvement, York St John University, York, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8610-0613
Wesley StuartNHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
Andrew EldersGlasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4172-4702
Julie BrittendenInstitute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo explore the feasibility and acceptability of pain management (transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)) and patient education (PE) to increase physical activity in people with peripheral arterial disease and intermittent claudication (IC).

designFeasibility randomised controlled trial with embedded process evaluation.

settingOne secondary care UK vascular centre.

participants56 community-dwelling adults with a history of stable IC and ankle-brachial pressure index ≤0.9 were recruited via claudication clinics.

interventionsParticipants randomised to 6 weeks of: TENS+PE, TENS, Placebo TENS+PE or Placebo TENS. PE was a 3-hour workshop plus three follow-up phone calls. The TENS machine was worn during walking (TENS: 120 Hz, 200 μs, intensity 'strong but comfortable'; Placebo TENS: intensity below sensation threshold). OUTCOMES: Primary feasibility outcomes included rates of recruitment, retention and adherence. Acceptability of the intervention and trial procedures was explored with semistructured interviews. Measures of walking capacity, walking behaviour, quality of life, disease perception and pain were recorded at baseline, end of intervention (6 weeks) and follow-up (3 months).

results56 participants were randomised from 95 who completed baseline screening. Of the 39 excluded, 97% (38/39) had >20% variability in absolute claudication distance. All participants received their allocated intervention. Outcome completion was 91% at 6 weeks and 80% at 3 months. Attendance at group education was 96% with 63% taking follow-up phone calls. Compliance with TENS was 70% according to participant-completed logs. Interviewed participants (n=9) were generally positive about the acceptability of the interventions and trial procedures; however, experience of TENS use was mixed. Some participants were dissatisfied with the size of the device and electrode wires.

conclusionsThe PrEPAID (Pain management and Patient Education for Physical Activity in Intermittent claudication) trial was feasible to run; however, 40% of potential participants were excluded at screening due to issues of research fidelity rather than participant suitability or willingness to participate. A future definitive trial should consider a revised primary outcome measure and smaller wireless TENS machines. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03204825. Registered on 2 July 2017. TRIAL

fundingChief Scientist Office, Scottish Government. Translational grant award (TCS/16/55).

Indexed as

ExerciseIntermittent ClaudicationPain ManagementPatient Education as TopicPeripheral Arterial DiseaseTranscutaneous Electric Nerve StimulationAgedFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeUnited KingdomWalkingBehaviorElectric Stimulation TherapyExerciseFeasibility StudiesPatient-Centered CareVASCULAR MEDICINE

Identifiers

PMID40701603
PMCPMC12306470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.