ArticleAnnals of botany2025
Role of stele and cortex in understanding and predicting root tensile properties.
Article in Annals of botany, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsThe mechanical properties of plant roots are crucial for soil stabilization and vegetation restoration. To effectively employ bioengineering methods, understanding the tensile properties of plant roots is essential. In most studies, root diameter is used as a predictor of tensile strength but this fails to accurately describe root mechanical behaviour. The stele and cortex are two anatomical parts of the root whose actual mechanical behaviour and specific contributions to root biomechanisms remain unclear.
methodsTensile tests and scanning electron micrography were performed on roots of four typical species (Robinia pseudoacacia, Pinus tabuliformis, Vitex negundo and Syzygium aromaticum) in the Loess Plateau of China to investigate the roles of the stele and cortex in explaining the root's tensile strength. Then, based on the 'same strain' principle, a tensile strength prediction model was developed and validated using experimental data from plant root. KEY
resultsThe stele and cortex of roots exhibited distinct mechanical behaviours: elastic plasticity and linear elasticity, respectively. Tensile strength was negatively correlated with diameter and stelar diameter and cortical thickness were positively correlated with diameter. The cortex had lower tensile strength, strain at maximum stress and thickness compared with the stele. The observed increase in scatter of tensile strength with decreasing root diameter was attributed to the higher coefficient of variation in cortical tensile strength compared with the stele. Notably, predicted results of intact root tensile strength fell within the 95 % prediction interval of the measured intact root tensile strength and could be enhanced 30-80 % by strengthening dataset quality.
conclusionsOur results demonstrated the actual mechanical behaviour characteristics of cortex and stele, and provide a new perspective for addressing the mechanical properties of roots using composite materials mechanics. The findings of this study will provide a theoretical foundation for implementing plant-based ecological restoration and disaster prevention measures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.