Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40700873›Full record

ArticleSurgery2025

Beyond TNM staging: Machine learning of individualized colon cancer outcomes.

Joseph H Cotler, Lauren M Janczewski, Ronald J Weigel, Xuan Zhu, Kelley Chan, Bryan Palis, Stephen B Edge, Heidi Nelson, Judy C Boughey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Joseph H CotlerAmerican College of Surgeons Cancer Programs, National Cancer Database, Chicago, IL. Electronic address: Jcotler@facs.org.
Lauren M JanczewskiAmerican College of Surgeons Cancer Programs, National Cancer Database, Chicago, IL.
Ronald J WeigelAmerican College of Surgeons Cancer Programs, National Cancer Database, Chicago, IL; Department of Surgery, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA.
Xuan ZhuAmerican College of Surgeons Cancer Programs, National Cancer Database, Chicago, IL.
Kelley ChanAmerican College of Surgeons Cancer Programs, National Cancer Database, Chicago, IL.
Bryan PalisAmerican College of Surgeons Cancer Programs, National Cancer Database, Chicago, IL.
Stephen B EdgeDepartment of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY.
Heidi NelsonEmeritus, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Judy C BougheyAmerican College of Surgeons Cancer Programs, National Cancer Database, Chicago, IL; Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

Funding

Viral VectorP30CA086862 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Douglas Robert Spitz · 2000 to 2026
$70.0M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA086862
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnatomic TNM staging lacks patient information that can influence cancer survival. Using machine learning, specifically extreme gradient boosting with survival embeddings, a model can be developed to improve predictive accuracy of patient survival by including additional clinical information.

methodsA retrospective study of 382,531 colon cancer cases diagnosed between 2018 and 2021 using the National Cancer Database. A random forest analysis was performed followed by training a machine learning model to develop survival predictions. Model 1 used only TNM staging to predict survival, whereas model 2 used TNM and the additional variables to predict survival. Predictive efficacy was compared using integrated Brier scores (a measure that predicts error rates), Harrell concordant indices (a measure that evaluates the discriminative ability of survival models), and time-dependent areas under the curve (a measure that assesses the performance of survival models).

resultsPredictive accuracy metrics demonstrated improvements in all areas including a 4-year Brier score of 0.19 for the TNM-only model, and 0.14 for the TNM with predictors model; a Harell concordance index for TNM-only of 0.73 and 0.83 for TNM with predictors. Finally, the average time-dependent area under the curve for TNM only was 0.75, and the average time-dependent area under the curve for TNM with predictors was 0.87.

conclusionMachine learning can be used to develop models of cancer survival that include clinical parameters resulting in more accurate predictions of patient outcomes compared with traditional TNM anatomic staging.

Indexed as

Colonic NeoplasmsMachine LearningAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPrognosisRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID40700873
PMCPMC13409426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.