ArticleClinical and experimental dental research2025
Predicting the Recurrence of Sporadic Odontogenic Keratocyst Using Whole-Slide Histopathology Images With the Hybrid Encoder Iterative Attention Convolution Model.
Article in Clinical and experimental dental research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A deep learning approach for the diagnosis and recurrence prediction of OKC.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence for the detection and diagnosis of oral and maxillofacial lesions: evidence, limitations, and future directions.Brazilian oral research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesOdontogenic keratocysts (OKCs) are challenging due to their aggressiveness and high recurrence rates, complicating decision-making for clinicians and pathologists. Despite efforts to identify predictive characteristics, management remains challenging. The study aims to design a reliable artificial intelligence model to enhance predictive models and distinguish between recurrent and nonrecurrent whole-slide images of OKCs. MATERIAL AND
methods84 OKC cases were selected for this study, including 29 whole slide images (WSIs) of recurrent OKCs and 35 WSIs of non-recurrent OKCs for model development. The model was evaluated using 14 non-recurrent and 6 recurrent cases. The proposed Hybrid Encoder Iterative Attention Convolution (HEIAC) model integrates the strengths of three fundamental components: an encoder, an attention mechanism, and convolutional layers to classify images effectively. The encoder learns to extract useful features, resulting in more meaningful representations that capture the underlying structure of the image data. Iterative attention enables the model to capture intricate details and subtle patterns that may be crucial for accurate image classification. Convolutional layers are designed to learn hierarchical representations of image features automatically. This model harnesses the capabilities of each component to achieve robust and accurate image classification.
resultsThe proposed HEIAC model attained 0.98 testing accuracy and exhibits superior performance across the majority of evaluation metrics, achieving 96% recall, 100% precision, a 97% F1-score, and a perfect AUC of 1.0, and used 96% fewer trainable parameters than the standard vision transformer.
conclusionsThis approach improves predictive models for distinguishing recurrent and non-recurrent OKCs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.