ArticleJNCI cancer spectrum2025
Impact of postoperative fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography on adjuvant head and neck cancer treatment.
Article in JNCI cancer spectrum, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
27 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundResidual or recurrent cancer after surgery but prior to adjuvant therapy occurs in a proportion of patients with head and neck cancer and may warrant treatment changes. 18-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) may help to identify residual or recurrent disease but is not routinely obtained. We evaluated the relevance of postoperative FDG-PET/CT in this clinical context.
methodsThis single-institution, retrospective study identified patients with head and neck cancer who underwent definitive surgery between January 1, 2013, and April 1, 2023, and received a postoperative FDG-PET/CT prior to adjuvant treatment. We measured the rates of management changes resulting from postoperative FDG-PET/CT findings and the association between having a postoperative FDG-PET/CT which resulted in a management change and oncologic outcomes with selected multivariable competing-risks and proportional hazards regressions.
resultsOf 150 patients, 66 (44.0%) had a management change because of the postoperative FDG-PET/CT findings; 62 (93.8%) had radiotherapy plan changes, 20 (30.3%) underwent additional diagnostic testing, 11 (16.7%) had systemic therapy added or changed, 3 (4.6%) underwent reresection, and 15 (10.0%) switched to palliative-intent treatment. Having a postoperative FDG-PET/CT that resulted in a management change was not significantly associated with cancer recurrence or overall survival (both P > .05).
conclusionsIn patients with resected head and neck cancer, postoperative, pre-adjuvant therapy FDG-PET/CT can alter clinical management and may enable additional personalization of treatment. When practical to obtain without delaying treatment, postoperative FDG-PET/CT may have clinical utility though requires careful interpretation due to the risks of false positives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.