Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40700599›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2025

Reducing redundancy and enhancing accuracy through a phylogenetically-informed microbial community metabolic modeling approach.

Sepideh Mofidifar, Mojtaba Tefagh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sepideh MofidifarDepartment of Bioinformatics, Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of Tehran, Tehran, 14176-14335, Iran.
Mojtaba TefaghDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, 14588-89694, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-2198-2440

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationMetabolic modeling has emerged as a powerful tool for predicting community functions. However, current modeling approaches face significant challenges in balancing the metabolic trade-offs between individual and community-level growth. In this study, we investigated the effect of metabolic relatedness among taxa on growth rate calculations by merging related taxa based on their metabolic similarity, introducing this approach as PhyloCOBRA.

resultsThis approach enhanced the accuracy and efficiency of microbial community simulations by combining genome-scale metabolic models (GEMs) of closely related organisms, aligning with the concepts of niche differentiation and nestedness theory. To validate our approach, we implemented PhyloCOBRA within the MICOM and OptCom package (creating PhyloMICOM and PhyloOptCom, respectively), and applied it to metagenomic data from 186 individuals and four-species synthetic community (SynCom). Our results demonstrated significant improvement in the accuracy and reliability of growth rate predictions compared to the standard methods. Sensitivity analysis revealed that PhyloMICOM models were more robust to random noise, while Jaccard index calculations showed a reduction in redundancy, highlighting the enhanced specificity of the generated community models. Furthermore, PhyloMICOM reduced the computational complexity, addressing a key concern in microbial community simulations. This approach marks a significant advancement in community-scale metabolic modeling, offering a more stable, efficient, and ecologically relevant tool for simulating and understanding the intricate dynamics of microbial ecosystems. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: PhyloCOBRA implementations are available as extensions to the MICOM packages and can be accessed at https://github.com/sepideh-mofidifar/PhyloCOBRA.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyMetagenomicsMicrobiotaModels, BiologicalPhylogenyComputer Simulation

Identifiers

PMID40700599
PMCPMC12296373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.