Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40700585›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care2025

A unified approach assessing Hospitals' Quality and Patient Safety Compliance at organizational and national level using an evidence-based Mapping Tool.

Angeliki Katsapi, Karanikas Haralampos, Dafni Kaitelidou, Eleftherios Thireos, Aggeliki Karaiskou, Maria Anastasia Tsana, Fotios Rizos

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Angeliki KatsapiEuro-Mediterranean Institute Quality & Safety in Healthcare services, Avedis Donabedian Eleutheriou Venizelou 58, Athens 10678, Greece.
Karanikas HaralamposDepartment of Computer Science and Biomedical Informatics, University of Thessaly, Papasiopoulou 2-4, Lamia 35131, Greece.
Dafni KaitelidouNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Papadiamantopoulou 123, Athens 11527, Greece.
Eleftherios ThireosNational Agency for Quality of Health, Pyrri 5, Athens 11527, Greece.
Aggeliki KaraiskouNational Agency for Quality of Health, Pyrri 5, Athens 11527, Greece.
Maria Anastasia TsanaEuro-Mediterranean Institute Quality & Safety in Healthcare services, Avedis Donabedian Eleutheriou Venizelou 58, Athens 10678, Greece.
Fotios RizosEuro-Mediterranean Institute Quality & Safety in Healthcare services, Avedis Donabedian Eleutheriou Venizelou 58, Athens 10678, Greece.

Funding

Department of Computer Science and Biomedical Informatics, University of Thessaly, Greece
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccording to the World Health Organization, the situational analysis process that establishes the current "state of quality" of a country's health system, is the foundational step to identifying the strategic directions of a National Quality Program for Quality of Care. This analysis that assesses relevant priorities, challenges, capacities, governance structures, and available resources, provides the basis for designing and implementing the appropriate program to support healthcare quality and patient safety improvements. Although there is a number of international standards related to quality and safety control, there is an undeniable need identified for a pragmatic method, incorporating clinical aspects, to determine the minimum required criteria for quality assurance and patient safety. This paper describes the development of a compliance assessment framework for quality and patient safety using a novel methodology covering also country-specific criteria to be utilized at an organizational and national level as a situational analysis tool.

methodsThis study outlines the methodology for the development of the Mapping tool for Quality and Patient Safety (MaQPS) and its implementation as a unified framework for assessing quality and patient safety compliance in hospital settings. The criteria integrated within the tool are reference-based and derive from European and national legislation, international patient safety standards as defined by international authoritative organizations (e.g. the World Health Organization), and scientific associations' guidelines. Furthermore, the study presents the validation process including the applied case studies that were used to evaluate functionality, contextual relevance and scalability of the tool.

resultsThe Mapping tool for Quality and Patient Safety compliance tool (MaQPS) and its design methodology differ from most approaches to healthcare assessment sets of criteria, as this instrument incorporates patient safety and clinical aspects within a quality assessment framework. The tool provides a systematic approach and a practical and traceable pathway, for identifying gaps and, facilitate benchmarking among healthcare providers. Additionally, it is a unique approach to enable evidence-based decision making in the field of national quality policies in healthcare.

conclusionWhile standardization and third-party inspections enhance quality improvement processes and clinical outcomes, many health systems face significant challenges in treating healthcare needs effectively with qualitative results and positive clinical outcomes. The adoption of MaQPS as a decision-support tool will acquaint health systems with the structured knowledge to build up effective quality and safety national policies in the delivery of care.

Indexed as

Guideline AdherenceHospitalsPatient SafetyQuality Assurance, Health CareQuality of Health CareHumansQuality Indicators, Health Carecompliancehospital assessmentmappingpatient safetyquality of carequality policiesquality toolsituational analysis

Identifiers

PMID40700585
PMCPMC12365638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.