ArticleInternational journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care2025
A unified approach assessing Hospitals' Quality and Patient Safety Compliance at organizational and national level using an evidence-based Mapping Tool.
Article in International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Expert narrative review on the impact of value-based healthcare on medical quality and patient safety system restructuring.BMC health services research · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAccording to the World Health Organization, the situational analysis process that establishes the current "state of quality" of a country's health system, is the foundational step to identifying the strategic directions of a National Quality Program for Quality of Care. This analysis that assesses relevant priorities, challenges, capacities, governance structures, and available resources, provides the basis for designing and implementing the appropriate program to support healthcare quality and patient safety improvements. Although there is a number of international standards related to quality and safety control, there is an undeniable need identified for a pragmatic method, incorporating clinical aspects, to determine the minimum required criteria for quality assurance and patient safety. This paper describes the development of a compliance assessment framework for quality and patient safety using a novel methodology covering also country-specific criteria to be utilized at an organizational and national level as a situational analysis tool.
methodsThis study outlines the methodology for the development of the Mapping tool for Quality and Patient Safety (MaQPS) and its implementation as a unified framework for assessing quality and patient safety compliance in hospital settings. The criteria integrated within the tool are reference-based and derive from European and national legislation, international patient safety standards as defined by international authoritative organizations (e.g. the World Health Organization), and scientific associations' guidelines. Furthermore, the study presents the validation process including the applied case studies that were used to evaluate functionality, contextual relevance and scalability of the tool.
resultsThe Mapping tool for Quality and Patient Safety compliance tool (MaQPS) and its design methodology differ from most approaches to healthcare assessment sets of criteria, as this instrument incorporates patient safety and clinical aspects within a quality assessment framework. The tool provides a systematic approach and a practical and traceable pathway, for identifying gaps and, facilitate benchmarking among healthcare providers. Additionally, it is a unique approach to enable evidence-based decision making in the field of national quality policies in healthcare.
conclusionWhile standardization and third-party inspections enhance quality improvement processes and clinical outcomes, many health systems face significant challenges in treating healthcare needs effectively with qualitative results and positive clinical outcomes. The adoption of MaQPS as a decision-support tool will acquaint health systems with the structured knowledge to build up effective quality and safety national policies in the delivery of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.