ArticlePLoS biology2025
Natural sounds can be reconstructed from human neuroimaging data using deep neural network representation.
Article in PLoS biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Text-to-music generation models capture musical semantic representations in the human brain.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Auditory Cortical Gradients Integrate Bottom-Up and Top-Down Structure During Natural Sound Categorisation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Reconstruction of perceptual experiences from brain activity offers a unique window into how population neural responses represent sensory information. Although decoding visual content from functional MRI (fMRI) has seen significant success, reconstructing arbitrary sounds remains challenging due to the fine temporal structure of auditory signals and the coarse temporal resolution of fMRI. Drawing on the hierarchical auditory features of deep neural networks (DNNs) with progressively larger time windows and their neural activity correspondence, we introduce a method for sound reconstruction that integrates brain decoding of DNN features and an audio-generative model. DNN features decoded from auditory cortical activity outperformed spectrotemporal and modulation-based features, enabling perceptually plausible reconstructions across diverse sound categories. Behavioral evaluations and objective measures confirmed that these reconstructions preserved short-term spectral and perceptual properties, capturing the characteristic timbre of speech, animal calls, and musical instruments, while the reconstructed sounds did not reproduce longer temporal sequences with fidelity. Leave-category-out analyses indicated that the method generalizes across sound categories. Reconstructions at higher DNN layers and from early auditory regions revealed distinct contributions to decoding performance. Applying the model to a selective auditory attention ("cocktail party") task further showed that reconstructions reflected the attended sound more strongly than the unattended one in some of the subjects. Despite its inability to reconstruct exact temporal sequences, which may reflect the limited temporal resolution of fMRI, our framework demonstrates the feasibility of mapping brain activity to auditory experiences-a step toward more comprehensive understanding and reconstruction of internal auditory representations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.