Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40700421›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2025

Assessment of comorbidities, risk factors, and post tuberculosis lung disease in National Tuberculosis Guidelines: A scoping review.

Muhammed S Bah, Kyaw Ko Ko Htet, Gregory P Bisson, Celso Khosa, Refiloe Masekela, Jamilah Meghji, Kagiso Mochankana, Andrea Rachow, Neelima Navuluri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Muhammed S BahDepartment of Population Health Science, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-9467-3086
Kyaw Ko Ko HtetDepartment of Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7853-7308
Gregory P BissonDepartment of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Celso KhosaInstituto Nacional de Saúde, Marracuene, Mozambique.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6701-4202
Refiloe MasekelaDepartment of Paediatrics and Child Health, School of Clinical Medicine, College of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
Jamilah MeghjiNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4693-8884
Kagiso MochankanaDepartment of Paediatrics and Child Health, School of Clinical Medicine, College of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
Andrea RachowDivision of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Neelima NavuluriDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care, Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1499-8073

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tuberculosis (TB) remains a major public health issue across the world and national TB guidelines are an important resource for diagnosis and treatment. This scoping review aimed to analyze how countries with the highest TB burdens approach the integration of comorbidity and risk factor screening, diagnosis and treatment, TB recurrence, and post-TB lung disease (PTLD) diagnosis and management, within their TB guidelines. We used the Arksey and O'Malley methodological framework to conduct a scoping review of TB guidelines among the WHO list of highest-TB burden countries. We identified drug-susceptible, drug-resistant, and consolidated guidelines through web searches and personal contacts within TB programs. We translated guidelines into English as needed and systematically extracted, recorded, and reviewed the guidelines to aggregate and describe our findings. Among the 49 countries with the highest TB burden, we successfully identified, translated, and analyzed 43 guidelines (24 drug-sensitive, 9 drug-resistance, and 10 consolidated) from 34 countries. Recommendations for screening varied by comorbidity or risk factor with the four most recommended being HIV/AIDS (100%), pregnancy (73%) and liver disease (59%) and mental health (59%). Recommendations for linkage to care were more infrequent and also varied with the top four being HIV (88%), liver disease (47%), diabetes (44%), and mental health (44%). Only 27 (79%) countries specified diagnostic tests to assess for TB recurrence among individuals presenting with symptoms post-TB treatment, with 25 recommending GeneXpert MTB/RIF. Notably, only 7 (21%) countries mentioned PTLD in their guidelines, with wide variations in their specific recommendations regarding screening, diagnosis, and management. Our findings highlight the lack of detailed guidance on how to properly diagnose and refer patients to appropriate care for various comorbidities or risk factors which may significantly impact microbiological and clinical TB treatment outcomes, including PTLD and ultimately point to an important opportunity for improvement in future guidelines.

Identifiers

PMID40700421
PMCPMC12286338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.