ArticlePloS one2025
The harmful effects of legislative restrictions on gender affirming hormone therapy in Florida and Missouri: Challenges for patients and providers.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Impact of Politicization on Adolescent Medicine Care: A Rapid Review.Current pediatrics reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Among the recent surge of legislative restrictions on the provision of gender affirming care to youth in the United States, some legislation, such as bills passed in 2023 in Florida and Missouri, have impacted the provision of care to adults. We sought to understand the impacts of these restrictions on both adult patients and health care providers seeking and providing gender affirming hormone therapy. We conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with 21 patients and seven health care providers and staff from Planned Parenthood health centers in these two states and identified key themes related to their experiences of accessing and providing gender affirming hormone therapy before and after the implementation of the restrictions on care. Main themes emerging from interviews with both patients and providers/staff included disruptions to accessing or providing care after the restrictions were implemented, their range of reactions to learning about the restrictions, the negative impacts of the restrictions on transgender and gender diverse (TGD) people's access to health care and providers' provision of care, and what they want policymakers to know about the impact of the restrictions. Providers and staff also discussed the internal rewards of providing gender affirming hormone therapy, and patients shared the negative consequences of the restrictions on their lives and well-being. Our findings suggest that legislative restrictions on gender affirming care cause psychological, physical, and financial harm to TGD individuals by creating conditions that impose lapses in care and contribute to a hostile environment for TGD people.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.