ArticlePloS one2025
Advanced feature engineering in Acute:Chronic Workload Ratio (ACWR) calculation for injury forecasting in elite soccer.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Injury Prediction and Risk Modelling in Team Sports Using Artificial Intelligence and Sensor-Based Monitoring: A Scoping Review.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2026Review
- Use of SEM-PLS analysis to predict sports injuries in professional football players through warehouse technology data.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Controlling training monotony and monitoring external workload using the Acute:Chronic Workload Ratio (ACWR) is a common practice among elite soccer teams to prevent non-contact injuries. However, recent research has questioned whether ACWR offers sufficient predictive power for injury prevention in elite competition settings. In this paper, we propose a novel feature engineering framework for training load management, inspired by bilinear modeling and signal processing principles. Our method represents external workload variables, derived from GPS data, as discrete time series, which are then integrated into a temporal matrix termed the Footballer Workload Footprint (FWF). We introduce calculus-based techniques-applying integral and differential operations-to derive two representations from the FWF matrix: a cumulative workload matrix ([Formula: see text]) generalizing Acute Workload (AW), and a temporal variation matrix ([Formula: see text]) generalizing Chronic Workload (CW) and formulating the ACWR. Our approach makes traditional workload metrics suitable for modern machine learning. Using real-world data from an elite soccer team competing in LaLiga (Spain's top division) and UEFA tournaments, we conducted exploratory and confirmatory analyses comparing multivariate models trained on FWF-derived features against those using traditional ACWR calculations. The FWF-based models consistently outperformed baseline methods across key performance metrics-including the Area Under the ROC Curve (ROC-AUC), Precision-Recall AUC (PR-AUC), Geometric Mean (G-Mean), and Accuracy-while reducing Type I and Type II errors. Tested on temporally independent holdout data, our top model performed robustly across all metrics with 95% confidence intervals. Permutation tests revealed a significant association between FWF matrices and injury risk, supporting the empirical validity of our approach. Additionally, we introduce an interpretability framework based on heatmap visualizations of the FWF's cumulative and temporal variations, enhancing explainability. These findings indicate that our approach offers a robust, interpretable, and generalizable framework for sports science and medical professionals involved in injury prevention and training load monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.