ArticlePloS one2025
An ICEEMDAN and SAX-based method for determining English reading comprehension status using functional near-infrared spectroscopy signals.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Learning Potential as a Dynamic Component of Academic Intelligence: An fNIRS-Based Dynamic Assessment Study of English Reading Comprehension.Journal of Intelligence · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate, rapid, and objective reading comprehension assessments, which are critical in both daily and educational lives, can be effectively conducted using brain signals. In this study, we proposed an improved complementary ensemble empirical mode decomposition with adaptive noise (ICEEMDAN) and symbolic aggregate approximation (SAX)-based method for determining the whole text reading comprehension status in English using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) signals. A total of 450 trials were recorded from 15 healthy participants as they read English texts. To facilitate labeling, participants were asked to rate their comprehension of the text using self-assessment scores, followed by answering a multiple-choice question with four options that comprehensively covered the whole text's content. The proposed method consists of pre-processing, feature extraction, and classification stages. In the pre-processing stage, intrinsic mode functions of the signals were obtained using the ICEEMDAN algorithm. In the feature extraction stage, following the SAX algorithm, statistical features were calculated. The extracted features were classified using the k-NN classifier. The proposed method tested three different labeling strategies: first, labeling the trials according to the responses to multiple-choice questions; second, labeling the trials based on self-assessment scores; and third, labeling the trials using a double-validation labeling strategy based on the intersection sets of the first two strategies. For the three strategies, the k-NN classifier achieved mean classification accuracies of 74.67%, 66.37%, and 89.02%, respectively. The results indicated that the proposed method could assess whole-text reading comprehension status in English.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.