ArticlePloS one2025
Bioinformatics and modelling studies of FhuD, the periplasmic siderophore binding protein from the plant pathogen Erwinia amylovora.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Erwinia amylovora, a Gram-negative phytopathogenic bacterium, is the etiological agent of fire blight in apples and pears. Key virulence factors include the exopolysaccharide amylovoran, the type III secretion system, and siderophore-mediated iron uptake. Within the iron uptake pathway, the periplasmic siderophore binding protein FhuD, unique to Erwinia species infecting Rosaceae, plays a vital role in transporting iron-loaded siderophores to the inner periplasmic membrane, making it a crucial target for structural and functional characterization. This article presents the predicted 3D model of FhuD from E. amylovora (FhuD_Ea), along with the sequence analyses and structural comparison of its homologs from eight organisms whose structures are available in the PDB. We also performed bioinformatics analysis on protein sequences of 145 orthologs. Despite the low sequence identity, the homologs exhibited similar structures, with consistent ligand binding clefts. Nine conserved residues, primarily located in the N-terminal domain, were identified, with the exception of GLY 202 (in the C-terminal domain of FhuD_Ea). Among orthologs, ILE 88 emerged as a notably conserved residue in the N-terminal region, while TRP 64, though often positioned in the binding cleft, was not universally conserved. A phylogenetic tree based on 145 orthologs revealed no distinct grouping between Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, suggesting that the periplasmic binding protein retains similar structural and functional characteristics across diverse bacterial lineages. The apparent lack of universally conserved residues in the ligand-binding pocket suggests functional flexibility, allowing FhuD to recognize siderophores with similar chemical features rather than identical structures. Molecular docking analyses further supported this hypothesis, showing that FhuD_Ea preferentially binds hydroxamate-type siderophores like ferrioxamine, but also accommodates structurally related ligands such as coprogen, with even greater binding affinity. These findings point to an adaptable binding mechanism that may enhance iron acquisition under varying environmental conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.