ArticlePloS one2025
TunR2, a novel mode-of-action tunicamycin-type antibiotic: Pharmacokinetics in C57BL/6 mouse and Holstein cattle.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We have investigated the pharmacokinetics of TunR2, a modified tunicamycin-type antibiotic, in mice and cattle. TunR2 has previously been shown to be effective in a mycobacterial disease model using zebrafish, with a minimal activation of the eukaryotic unfolded protein response (upr) and a reduction in the in vivo mycobacterial burden. In this study, we presented statistically relevant pharmacokinetics of native tunicamycin (Tun) and two less toxic modified analogs, TunR2 and TunR1, using a well-defined clonal C57BL/6 mouse (both male and female). Blood samples were collected at multiple time points, and plasma concentrations were quantified using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using a two-compartment analysis. Our findings indicate that Tun and TunR1 tend to distribute in tissue compared to TunR2, which has a longer half-life than Tun. This translates into longer TunR2 activity time, potentially allowing for less frequent dosing than Tun or TunR1. We subsequently administered the modified TunR2 to Holstein cattle using a three-bolus intravenous regimen. We monitored blood, milk, urine, and feces over 90 days. In dairy cattle, the pharmacokinetics of TunR2 appear to be cumulative, and clear after 10 days. These findings provide critical new insights into the pharmacokinetics of TunR2. We concluded that TunR2 has considerable potential for treating bacterial infections, particularly as an antimicrobial adjuvant with well-established β-lactam antibiotics. Further studies are required to study safety and optimize dosing regimens for effective therapeutic use, as well as in combination with other antibiotics, such as β-lactams.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.