ArticlePLOS digital health2025
Radiomics analysis for the early diagnosis of common sexually transmitted infections and skin lesions.
Article in PLOS digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Correction: Radiomics analysis for the early diagnosis of common sexually transmitted infections and skin lesions.PLOS digital health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early identification of sexually transmitted infection (STI) symptoms can prevent subsequent complications and improve STI control. We analysed 597 images from STIAtlas and categorised the images into four typical STIs and two skin lesions by the anatomical sites of infections. We first applied nine image filters and 11 machine-learning image classifiers to the images. We then extracted radiomics features from the filtered images and trained them with 99 models that combined image filters and classifiers. Model performance was evaluated by area under curve (AUC) and permutation importance. When the information of infection sites was unspecified, a combined Gradient-Boosted Decision Trees (GBDT) classifier and Laplacian of Gaussian (LoG) filter model achieved the best overall performance with an average AUC of 0.681 (95% CI 0.628-0.734). This model predicted best for lichen sclerosus (AUC = 0.768, 0.740-0.796). The incorporation of infection site information led to a substantial improvement in the model's performance, with 22.3% improvement for anal infections (AUC = 0.833, 0.687-0.979) and 3.8% for skin infections (AUC = 0.707, 0.608-0.806). Lesion texture and statistical radiomics features were the most predictive for STIs. Combining machine learning and radiomics techniques is an effective method to categorise skin lesions associated with STIs clinically.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.