ArticleEuropean burn journal2025
An Epidemiological Survey of Fluid Resuscitation Practices for Adult Burns Patients in the United Kingdom.
Article in European burn journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From Evaporation to Edema: A Scoping Review of Physical and Biological Determinants of Early Fluid Distribution in Burn Patients.European burn journal · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fluid management is a critical component in the treatment of patients suffering with major burns. Clinicians must carefully balance judicious resuscitation with the risks of over- or under-resuscitation. We aimed to identify factors associated with survival in burns patients and determine the importance of resuscitation practices. Patients requiring admission to Burns Services in the United Kingdom between 1 April 2022 and 31 March 2023 were included in the National Burns Audit project on fluid resuscitation practices, to evaluate factors associated with survival and Critical Care Length of Stay (CCLoS). A total of 198 patients were included in the analyses, with median age of 51 years (interquartile range, (IQR) 35-62 years), median Total Burn Surface Area (TBSA%) of 27.5% (IQR 20-40%), and median Baux score 82.5 (IQR 66-105). The following were found to be significant for survival: younger age, smaller TBSA%, lower Baux score and independence from renal replacement therapy. Neither the mechanism of burns nor the fluid resuscitation volumes appeared to influence survival. Although interventions such as tracheostomy or the number of surgical procedures did not appear to affect survival, fluid replacement of more than 6 mL/kg/%TBSA independently predicted longer CCLoS. Volume of fluid resuscitation, within the limits examined in this cohort, did not impact likelihood of survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.