Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40700292›Full record

ReviewAntibodies (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Fragment-Based Immune Cell Engager Antibodies in Treatment of Cancer, Infectious and Autoimmune Diseases: Lessons and Insights from Clinical and Translational Studies.

Ge Yang, Mohammad Massumi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Antibodies (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ge YangDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2624-4412
Mohammad MassumiDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8291-9798

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the advent of recombinant DNA technologies and leading up to the clinical approval of T cell engager blinatumomab, the modular design of therapeutic antibodies has enabled the fusion of antibody fragments with proteins of various functionalities. This has resulted in an expansive array of possible mechanisms of action and has given birth to fragment-based antibodies (fbAbs) with immune cell engager modalities. In searchable databases, the preclinical development of these antibodies has shown promise; however, clinical outcomes and restructuring efforts involving these agents have produced mixed results and uncertainties. Amid budgetary cuts in both academia and industry, critical planning and evaluation of drug R&D would be more essential than ever before. While many reviews have provided outstanding summaries of preclinical phase fbAbs and cataloged relevant clinical trials, to date, very few of the articles in searchable databases have comprehensively reviewed the details of clinical outcomes along with the underlying reasons or potential explanations for the success and failures of these fbAb drug products. To fill the gap, in this review, we seek to provide the readers with clinically driven insights, accompanied by translational and mechanistic studies, on the current landscape of fragment-based immune cell engager antibodies in treating cancer, infectious, and autoimmune diseases.

Indexed as

antibody clinical developmentantibody engineeringantibody translational medicineB cell engagersfragment-based antibodyimmune cell engagersimmune checkpointmyeloid cell engagersNK cell engagersT cell engagers

Identifiers

PMID40700292
PMCPMC12286136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.