ArticleGeriatrics (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Development of a Specialized Telemedicine Protocol for Cognitive Disorders: The TeleCogNition Project in Greece.
Article in Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesAccess to specialized care for patients with cognitive impairment in remote areas is often limited. Despite the increasing adoption of telemedicine, standardized guidelines have not yet been specified. This study aimed to develop a comprehensive protocol for the specialized neurological, neuropsychological, and neuropsychiatric assessment of patients with cognitive disorders in remote areas through telemedicine.
methodsWe analyzed data from (i) a comprehensive literature review of the existing recommendations, reliability studies, and telemedicine models for cognitive disorders, (ii) insights from a three-year experience of a specialized telemedicine outpatient clinic for cognitive movement disorders in Greece, and (iii) suggestions coming from dementia specialists experienced in telemedicine (neurologists, neuropsychologists, psychiatrists) who took part in three focus groups. A critical synthesis of the findings was performed in the end.
resultsThe final protocol included: technical and organizational requirements (e.g., a high-resolution screen and a camera with zoom, room dimensions adequate for gait assessment, a noise-canceling microphone); medical history; neurological, neuropsychiatric, and neuropsychological assessment adapted to videoconferencing; ethical-legal aspects (e.g., data security, privacy, informed consent); clinician-patient interaction (e.g., empathy, eye contact); diagnostic work-up; linkage to other services (e.g., tele-psychoeducation, caregiver support); and instructions for treatment and follow-up.
conclusionsThis protocol is expected to serve as an example of good clinical practice and a source for official telemedicine guidelines for cognitive disorders. Ultimate outcomes include the potential enhanced access to specialized care, minimized financial and logistical costs, and the provision of a standardized, effective model for the remote diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up. This model could be applied not only in Greece, but also in other countries with similar healthcare systems and populations living in remote, difficult-to-access areas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.