Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40700083›Full record

ReviewVision (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Analysis of the Awareness and Access of Eye Healthcare in Underserved Populations.

Karen Allison, Abdullah Virk, Asma Alamri, Deepkumar Patel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vision (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Karen AllisonDepartment of Ophthalmology, Flaum Eye Institute, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, NY 14641, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3100-9545
Abdullah VirkDepartment of Ophthalmology, Flaum Eye Institute, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, NY 14641, USA.
Asma AlamriSchool of Health Sciences and Practice, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, NY 10595, USA.
Deepkumar PatelPrevention of Blindness from Glaucoma and Age Related Macular Degeneration, Floral Park, New York, NY 11001, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionVisual impairment impacts millions of people around the world, with the vast majority of problems being treatable. Disadvantaged communities are unable to utilize the same resources to treat these problems due to a lack of knowledge or resources, in addition to the presence of barriers preventing access. The objective of this paper is to assess eye health awareness and evaluate the barriers for individuals from disadvantaged communities in order to inform future interventions and increase access to care.

methodsThis is a pilot study utilizing an online anonymous questionnaire designed to assess the demographics, eye health awareness, and access to eye care of community-based patients. A comprehensive literature review was also conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar to evaluate barriers to eye care and methods to improve community health outcomes. The primary goal was to improve understanding of eye health awareness and access in order to inform future strategies that can help in improving eye health awareness and service availability.

resultsThe results indicated that 61.2% of respondents believed that eye exams are very important, and only 7.7% of participants believed that regular eye exams are not important. The majority of participants (75%) agree that regular eye exams help prevent serious eye conditions and 84.5% believe that eye health can affect quality of life. 35.6% of participants reported they had their eyes checked by a healthcare professional within the last year, while 21.2% reported never having an eye exam. Although the majority of participants found access to eye care services in their community somewhat or very easy, 8.6% and 9.5% of participants found access difficult and very difficult, respectively. Even though 45.6% of participants reported not facing any barriers regarding access to eye care, the cost of services, long waiting times, and lack of nearby eye care providers were often cited as barriers from the remainder of the participants. Moving forward, local interventions such as mobile eye clinics, public health workshops, and telehealth are viable options to obtain an understanding of the community's health status in addition to creating opportunities to educate and provide health screenings.

conclusionThe results indicate that although there is awareness of the importance of eye health for the majority of participants, there is still a sizable minority who have insufficient understanding. Barriers to healthcare such as cost, waiting times, and proximity to providers are common problems that are preventing many from seeking eye care. Future interventions should be created to increase access and literacy amongst the community through telehealth, mobile eye clinics, and public health workshops. Additional efforts should be taken by healthcare stakeholders to enhance care delivery, implement policies, and improve awareness.

Indexed as

eye careeye care accesssocial determinants of healthvision awarenessvision care

Identifiers

PMID40700083
PMCPMC12286042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.