Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40700081›Full record

ArticleVision (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Stronger Short-Term Memory, Larger Hippocampi and Area V1 in People with High VVIQ Scores.

David F Marks

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vision (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

David F MarksArles, Bouches-du-Rhône, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur, 13200, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9823-3229

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reports of individual differences in vividness of visual mental imagery (VMI) scores raise complex questions: Are Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire (VVIQ) score differences actually measuring anything? What functions do these differences serve? What is their neurological foundation? A new analysis examined visual short-term memory (VSTM) and volumes of the hippocampi, primary visual cortices, and other cortical regions among vivid and non-vivid visual imagers. In a sample of 53 volunteers aged 54 to 80 with MRI scans, the performance of ten Low VVIQ scorers was compared to that of ten High VVIQ scorers. The groups included an aphantasic with a minimum VVIQ score and a hyperphantasic with a maximum VVIQ score. The study examined volumes for 12 hippocampal subfields, 11 fields implicated in visual mental imagery including area V1 and the fusiform gyrus, and 7 motor regions. In comparison to the Low VVIQ group, High VVIQ group yielded: (i) significantly more accurate VSTM performance; and (ii) significantly larger volumes of the hippocampi and primary visual cortex. Across 47 brain regions, the average volume for the High VVIQ group exceeded that of the Low VVIQ group by 11 percent. For 47 subfields, the volumes of the hphantasic exceeded those of the aphantasic person by an average of 57 percent. Females had more accurate visual short-term memory than males and younger people were more accurate than older people. The larger visual memory capacity of females was unmatched by larger regional volume differences, which suggests that the sex difference in visual memory is caused by factors other than cortical regional size. The study confirms the existence of robust empirical associations between VMI vividness, short-term memory, regional volume of hippocampal subfields and area V1.

Indexed as

aphantasiacortexhippocampushyperphantasiaindividual differencesshort-term memoryvisual mental imageryVVIQ

Identifiers

PMID40700081
PMCPMC12285986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.