ArticleVision (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Evidence Based Analysis Enhances Surgical Outcomes of Novice Resident Surgeons.
Article in Vision (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Evidence based practice enhances healthcare delivery and prevents unsafe procedures. While competency based assessments of resident cataract surgery are standard, evidence based analysis of refractive outcomes remains underutilized in educational curricula. This retrospective single center study evaluated refractive outcomes from 21 novice ophthalmology resident surgeons. Three independent groups were compared based on formal constant optimization for intraocular lens (IOL) calculation: non-optimized Haigis (n = 216), a0-optimized (n = 94), and a0/a1/a2-optimized (n = 121). All surgeries were supervised by a single attending surgeon. Mean absolute error (MAE) and the percentage of eyes within ±0.25 D and ±0.50 D of predicted spherical equivalent (SEQ) were calculated. Also, systematic bias in effective lens position (ELP) was analyzed to update manufacturer IOL constants. MAE improved from 0.44 D (non-optimized) to 0.35 D (a0-optimized
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.