Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40700048›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of neonatal screening2025

Historical Appreciation of World Health Organization's Public Health Paper-34: Principles and Practice of Screening for Disease, by Max Wilson and Gunnar Jungner.

Peter C J I Schielen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of neonatal screening, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Peter C J I SchielenInternational Society for Neonatal Screening, Reigerskamp 273, 3607 HP Maarssen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5630-7322

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biographies of Max Wilson and Gunnar Jungner were published in 2017 and 2020. An in-depth appreciation of the Wilson and Jungner principles, and the publication they were presented in, 'Principles and Practice of Screening for Disease', published as nr. 34 in the Public Health Paper-series of the World Health Organisation (W.H.O), called PHP-34 hereafter, was not published as yet. Here an analysis is given of PHP-34 and the ten screening principles, focusing on three subjects. First, by careful analysis of PHP-34, the literature published in the peer reviewed scientific literature, and other sources, the historical background and origin of the ten principles is determined. Second, the precise composition of PHP-34 is described, as parts of the monograph were derived from other seminal works published between roughly 1950 and 1965. Third, it is determined what the contributions of both authors of the monograph were. Results together are discussed in relation to the time PHP-34 was conceptualized and the importance of PHP-34 and the ten principles in the current era. Results show that in the 15 years preceding the publication of PHP-34, many principles of screening were published by authors in the United States of America, a selection of which ended up in PHP-34. Secondly, about 33% of the 145 pages of PHP-34 are drawn from other publications and studies on screening. Thirdly, the case can be made that the actual writing of PHP-34 was done (almost) entirely by Wilson. Regardless, Wilson and Jungner to this day should be applauded for their work. It is a testimony to the value of PHP-34 that we are still reflecting upon, discussing and seeking to intelligently apply the screening principles almost 60 years after their original publication.

Indexed as

Gunnar JungnerMaxwell Wilsonscreening principlesW.H.O. public health papers monograph 34Wilson and Jungner principles

Identifiers

PMID40700048
PMCPMC12286092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.