ArticleInternational journal of neonatal screening2025
Neonatology Providers Need Education About Cystic Fibrosis Newborn Screening Algorithms.
Article in International journal of neonatal screening, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
An essential link in the cystic fibrosis (CF) newborn screening (NBS) process is communication of results. While this is described between NBS programs and primary care providers, data of this occurrence is limited with neonatologists. Neonatology providers represent a group caring for critically ill infants with conditions that can impact their ability to complete diagnostic testing after an abnormal NBS. Delays in testing can prolong time to diagnosis. We fielded a survey to assess neonatology provider knowledge and awareness of the Pennsylvania state CF NBS algorithm after an update occurred. Provider demographics, awareness of CF NBS update, and knowledge of the diagnostic testing process were measured. 86% of respondents were unaware of Pennsylvania CF NBS updates. Provider comfort with interpreting CF NBS results varied. 40% of providers identified the next diagnostic testing steps for a critically ill infant following an abnormal CF NBS. Our survey emphasizes the need for educating neonatology providers about CF NBS to improve knowledge and awareness of CF NBS algorithms to facilitate the early diagnosis of affected infants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.