Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40700036›Full record

RevieweLife2025

A dual nature of γδ T cell immune memory responses.

Tsz Kin Suen, Burcu Al, Alice Scarpa, Anca Dorhoi, Mihai G Netea, Katarzyna Placek

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in eLife, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tsz Kin SuenImmunology and Metabolism Unit, Life and Medical Sciences (LIMES) Institute, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0097-7634
Burcu AlImmunology and Metabolism Unit, Life and Medical Sciences (LIMES) Institute, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-9785-5778
Alice ScarpaImmunology and Metabolism Unit, Life and Medical Sciences (LIMES) Institute, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-8710-0738
Anca DorhoiInstitut of Immunology, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Federal Research Institute for Animal Health, Greifswald-Insel Riems, Germany.
Mihai G NeteaImmunology and Metabolism Unit, Life and Medical Sciences (LIMES) Institute, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2421-6052
Katarzyna PlacekImmunology and Metabolism Unit, Life and Medical Sciences (LIMES) Institute, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4944-6375

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 390873048European Commission 10.3030/101136346European Commission 10.3030/798582European Research Council 10.3030/833247Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research Spinoza grant
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immune memory was considered for decades an exclusive hallmark of the adaptive immune response. However, recent studies have revealed that innate immune cells can also 'recall' information of a primary insult during infection or vaccination and deploy robust antigen-agonistic immune reactivity upon secondary challenge. This

Indexed as

Immunologic MemoryReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell, gamma-deltaT-LymphocytesAnimalsHumansImmunity, InnateReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell, gamma-deltagamma delta T cellsimmune memoryimmunologyinflammationtrained immunity

Identifiers

PMID40700036
PMCPMC12286608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.