Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40699896›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical education2025

Innovative Mobile App (CPD By the Minute) for Continuing Professional Development in Medicine: Multimethods Study.

Peter Slinger, Maram Omar, Sarah Younus, Rebecca Charow, Michael Baxter, Craig Campbell, Meredith Giuliani, Jesse Goldmacher, Tharshini Jeyakumar, Inaara Karsan and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Peter SlingerUniversity Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2292-8654
Maram OmarOntario Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0009-0000-5358-4757
Sarah YounusUniversity Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0728-7628
Rebecca CharowUniversity Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8553-4006
Michael BaxterSt Joseph's Health Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4006-5031
Craig CampbellFaculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9339-3410
Meredith GiulianiTemerty School of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1827-5590
Jesse GoldmacherUniversity Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0009-0008-2601-903X
Tharshini JeyakumarUniversity Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4482-3637
Inaara KarsanUniversity Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9182-0300
Janet PapadakosPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6320-4156
Tina PapadakosPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8215-8810
Alexandra Jane RotsteinFoothills Medical Centre, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID 0009-0000-4380-2431
May-Sann YeeSouthlake Health, Newmarket, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5442-6822
Asad SiddiquiTemerty School of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7795-8231
Marcos Silva RestrepoTemerty School of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9884-9357
Melody ZhangMastercard Foundation, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6341-1024
David WiljerUniversity Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2748-2658

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany national medical governing bodies encourage physicians to engage in continuing professional development (CPD) activities to cultivate their knowledge and skills to ensure their clinical practice reflects the current standards and evidence base. However, physicians often encounter various barriers that hinder their participation in CPD programs, such as time constraints, a lack of centralized coordination, and limited opportunities for self-assessment. The literature has highlighted the strength of using question-based learning interventions to augment physician learning and further enable change in practice. CPD By the Minute (CPD-Min) is a smartphone-enabled web-based app that was developed to address self-assessment gaps and barriers to engagement in CPD activities.

objectiveThis study aimed to assess the app using four objectives: (1) engagement and use of the app throughout the study, (2) effectiveness of this tool as a CPD activity, (3) relevance of the disseminated information to physicians' practice, and (4) acceptability to physicians of this novel tool as an educational initiative.

methodsThe CPD-Min app disseminated 2 multiple-choice questions (1-min each) each week with feedback and references. Participants included licensed staff physicians, fellows, and residents across Canada. A concurrent multimethods study was conducted, consisting of preintervention and postintervention surveys, semistructured interviews, and app analytics. Guided by the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance framework, the qualitative data were analyzed deductively and inductively.

resultsOf the 105 Canadian anesthesiologists participating in the study, 89 (84.8%) were staff physicians, 12 (11.4%) were fellows, and 4 (3.8%) were residents. Participants completed 110 questions each over the course of 52 weeks, with an average completion rate of 75% (SD 33%). In total, 40.9% (43/105) of participants answered >90% of the questions, including 15.2% (16/105) who completed all questions. Moreover, 69% (52/75) of participants reported the app to be an effective and valuable resource for their practice and to enhance continuous learning. Most participants (63/75, 84%) who completed the postsurveys reported that they would likely continue using the app as a CPD tool. These findings were further supported by the interview data. Three key themes were identified: the practical design of the novel educational app facilitates its adoption by clinicians, the app was perceived as a useful knowledge tool for continuous learning, and the app's low-stakes testing environment cultivated independent learning attitudes.

conclusionsThe findings suggest the potential of the app to improve longitudinal assessments that promote lifelong learning among clinicians. The positive feedback and increased acceptance of the app supports it as an innovative tool for knowledge retention and CPD. Future research efforts should prioritize evaluating the app's long-term sustainability and its impact on physicians' practice, as well as exploring alternative approaches (such as artificial intelligence-based tools) for generating questions.

Indexed as

Education, Medical, ContinuingMobile ApplicationsCanadaClinical CompetenceFemaleHumansMalePhysiciansSurveys and Questionnairesartificial intelligencecontinuing professional developmentlifelong learningmobile appquestion-based learningself-assessment

Identifiers

PMID40699896
PMCPMC12329386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.