ReviewCurrent issues in molecular biology2025
Targeting Cancer Cell Fate: Apoptosis, Autophagy, and Gold Nanoparticles in Treatment Strategies.
Review in Current issues in molecular biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating Gold Nanoparticles with Brachytherapy: In Vitro Insights into Radiosensitization in Cervical Cancer.Cancers · 2026Article
- xCELLigence™ RTCA system in cancer biology: innovations in real-time functional profiling.Cytotechnology · 2026Review
- A novel therapeutic strategy against gastric carcinoma: artemisia sieberi-derived biogenic zno nanoparticles inducing intrinsic apoptosis and suppressing AGS cell proliferation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Autophagy and Lysosomal Dysregulation in Endometriosis: Therapeutic Opportunities and Molecular Insights.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2026Review
- Review
- Strain-SpecificInternational journal of nanomedicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
At the intersection of nanotechnology and cancer biology, gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) have emerged as more than passive carriers-they are active agents capable of reshaping cellular fate. Among their most promising attributes is the potential to modulate apoptosis and autophagy, two intricately linked pathways that determine tumor response to stress, damage, and treatment. Apoptosis serves as the principal mechanism of programmed cell death, while autophagy offers a dualistic role-preserving survival under transient stress or contributing to cell death under sustained insult. Thus, understanding how these mechanisms interact-and how AuNPs influence this crosstalk-may be key to unlocking more effective oncologic therapies. This review explores the molecular interplay between apoptosis and autophagy in cancer and evaluates how AuNPs impact these pathways. By enhancing radiosensitization in radiation therapy and improving drug delivery and chemotherapeutic precision, AuNPs offer a unique strategy to circumvent resistance in aggressive or refractory tumors towards shaping their biological behavior and cellular pathways and, therefore, forming a patient-centered personalized therapeutic potential. Yet, clinical translation remains challenging. The dynamic physicochemical nature of AuNPs makes their biological behavior highly context-dependent. Combined with the complexity of apoptotic and autophagic signaling and tumor heterogeneity, this creates a triad of profound intricacy. However, within this complexity lies therapeutic opportunity. Framing AuNPs, apoptosis, and autophagy as a synergistic axis may enable mechanism-informed, adaptable, and patient-specific cancer therapies. This paradigm shift invites a more strategic integration of nanotechnology with molecular oncology, advancing the frontier of precision medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.