Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40699846›Full record

ReviewCurrent issues in molecular biology2025

The Application of Microsatellite Markers as Molecular Tools for Studying Genomic Variability in Vertebrate Populations.

Roman O Kulibaba, Kornsorn Srikulnath, Worapong Singchat, Yuriy V Liashenko, Darren K Griffin, Michael N Romanov

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current issues in molecular biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Genome-Wide Association Studies in Japanese Quails of the FInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Roman O KulibabaDepartment of Animal Biology, National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, 03041 Kyiv, Ukraine.ORCID 0000-0003-1776-7147
Kornsorn SrikulnathAnimal Genomics and Bioresource Research Unit (AGB Research Unit), Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, Chatuchak, Bangkok 10900, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-5985-7258
Worapong SingchatAnimal Genomics and Bioresource Research Unit (AGB Research Unit), Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, Chatuchak, Bangkok 10900, Thailand.
Yuriy V LiashenkoLivestock Farming Institute, National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of Ukraine, 61026 Kharkiv, Ukraine.ORCID 0000-0003-2747-476X
Darren K GriffinAnimal Genomics and Bioresource Research Unit (AGB Research Unit), Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, Chatuchak, Bangkok 10900, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-7595-3226
Michael N RomanovAnimal Genomics and Bioresource Research Unit (AGB Research Unit), Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, Chatuchak, Bangkok 10900, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-3584-4644

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vertebrate molecular genetic research methods typically employ single genetic loci (monolocus markers) and those involving a variable number of loci (multilocus markers). The former often employ microsatellites that ensure accuracy in establishing inbreeding, tracking pan-generational dynamics of genetic parameters, assessing genetic purity, and facilitating genotype/phenotype correlations. They also enable the determination and identification of unique alleles by studying and managing marker-assisted breeding regimes to control the artificial selection of agriculturally important traits. Microsatellites consist of 2-6 nucleotides that repeat numerous times and are widely distributed throughout genomes. Their main advantages lie in their ease of use for PCR amplification, their known genome localization, and their incredible polymorphism (variability) levels. Robust lab-based molecular technologies are supplemented by high-quality statistics and bioinformatics and have been widely employed, especially in those instances when more costly, high throughput techniques are not available. Here, we consider that human and livestock microsatellite studies have been a "roadmap" for the genetics, breeding, and conservation of wildlife and rare animal breeds. In this context, we examine humans and other primates, cattle and other artiodactyls, chickens and other birds, carnivores (cats and dogs), elephants, reptiles, amphibians, and fish. Studies originally designed for mass animal production have thus been adapted to save less abundant species, highlighting the need for molecular scientists to consider where research may be applied in different disciplines.

Indexed as

allelesanimal populationsapplicationsconservationgenetic diversitygenome functionsmarker-assisted breedingmicrosatellitesmolecular markersPCRvertebrate species

Identifiers

PMID40699846
PMCPMC12191956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.