Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40699738›Full record

ArticleCurrent issues in molecular biology2025

Computational Modelling of Tunicamycin C Interaction with Potential Protein Targets: Perspectives from Inverse Docking with Molecular Dynamic Simulation.

Vivash Naidoo, Ikechukwu Achilonu, Sheefa Mirza, Rodney Hull, Jeyalakshmi Kandhavelu, Marushka Soobben, Clement Penny

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current issues in molecular biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Molecular Pharmacology at the Crossroads of Precision Medicine.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Vivash NaidooDepartment of Internal Medicine, Medicine, Wits/MRC Common Epithelial Cancer Research Centre, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 2050, South Africa.
Ikechukwu AchilonuProtein Structure-Function Research Unit, School of Molecular and Cell Biology, Faculty of Science, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 2050, South Africa.
Sheefa MirzaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Medicine, Wits/MRC Common Epithelial Cancer Research Centre, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 2050, South Africa.
Rodney HullSAMRC Precision Oncology Research Unit (PORU), DSI/NRF SARChI Chair in Precision Oncology and Cancer Prevention (POCP), Pan African Cancer Research Institute (PACRI), University of Pretoria, Hatfield, Pretoria 0028, South Africa.
Jeyalakshmi KandhaveluDepartment of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown, University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20007, USA.
Marushka SoobbenProtein Structure-Function Research Unit, School of Molecular and Cell Biology, Faculty of Science, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 2050, South Africa.
Clement PennyDepartment of Internal Medicine, Medicine, Wits/MRC Common Epithelial Cancer Research Centre, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 2050, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-4429-5712

Funding

South African Medical Research Council N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein glycosylation plays a crucial role in cancer biology, influencing essential cellular processes such as cell signalling, immune recognition, and tumour metastasis. Therefore, this study highlights the therapeutic potential of targeting glycosylation in cancer treatment, as modulating these modifications could disrupt the fundamental mechanisms driving cancer progression and improve therapeutic outcomes. Recently, Tunicamycin C, a well-known glycosylation inhibitor, has shown promise in breast cancer treatment but remains unexplored in colorectal cancer (CRC). Thus, in this study, we aimed to understand the potential action of Tunicamycin C in CRC using in silico studies to identify possible drug targets for Tunicamycin C. First, we identified two target proteins using the HTDocking algorithm followed by GO and KEGG pathway searches: thymidine kinase 1 (TK1) and cAMP-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit alpha (PKAc). Following this, molecular dynamics modelling revealed that Tunicamycin C binding induced a conformational perturbation in the 3D structures of TK1 and PKAc, inhibiting their activities. This interaction led to a stable design, promoting optimal binding of Tunicamycin C in the hydrophobic pockets of TK1 and PKAc. Serial validation studies highlighted the role of active site residues in binding stabilisation. Tunicamycin C exhibited high binding affinity with TK1 and PKAc. This study provides a way to explore and repurpose novel inhibitors of TK1 and PKAc and identify new therapeutic targets, which may block glycosylation in cancer treatment.

Indexed as

CRC (colorectal cancer)glycosylationin silico techniquesmolecular dynamicsprotein kinase Atherapeutic targetsthymidine kinase 1Tunicamycin

Identifiers

PMID40699738
PMCPMC12110290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.