ArticleJAMA2025
Telehealth and Online Cognitive Behavioral Therapy-Based Treatments for High-Impact Chronic Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Article in JAMA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04523714 (Tailored Non-Pharmacotherapy Services for Chronic Pain), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Tailored Non-Pharmacotherapy Services for Chronic Pain: Testing Scalable and Pragmatic Approaches
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy for musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Pooled it
- Cost-Effectiveness of Remote Cognitive-Behavioral-Based Therapy for Chronic Pain Among People With High-Impact Chronic Pain.Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research · 2026Trial
- Effect of self-management interventions on high impact chronic pain prevalence.The journal of pain · 2026Trial
- Trial
- Specific and shared mechanisms mediating pain intensity and functional outcomes in chronic neck pain.Pain management · 2026Trial
- Prediction, pain, and the power of context: toward a contemporary identity for the chiropractic profession.Chiropractic & manual therapies · 2026Review
- Rural-Urban Differences in the Impact of a Medicare Opioid Safety Policy on Beneficiaries with Disabilities.American journal of preventive medicine · 2026Article
- Do somatic symptoms bias depression screening? Reliability and equivalence of PHQ-8 in those with and without chronic pain: A nationally representative study of U.S. adults.Journal of affective disorders · 2026Article
- Postherpetic Neuralgia: Mechanisms, Risk Factors, and Stratified Management-A Narrative Review.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2026Review
- Development and Pilot Testing of a Mobile App Psychosocial Intervention for Psychological Distress in Individuals with Glaucoma.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Feasibility of Videoconference-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Somatic Symptom Disorder: Single-Arm Pilot Trial.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Review
- Article
- Use of advance letters to enhance participant retention in a clinical trial.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and Pain Chronification: Neuroimmune Rationale, Evidence Boundaries, and Trial Design Priorities: A Structured Narrative Review.Journal of pain research · 2026Review
- Organization of coping strategies and their proximal associations with pain intensity in spinal pain patients.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Myofascial pain in older adults: a geroscience-informed framework integrating precision geriatrics and digital therapeutics.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Review
- Navigating Chronic Pain in Patients with Cirrhosis: Unique Analgesic Considerations and Non-Pharmacologic Options.Current hepatology reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) skills training interventions are recommended first-line nonpharmacologic treatment for chronic pain, yet they are not widely accessible. Objective: To examine effectiveness of remote, scalable CBT-based chronic pain (CBT-CP) treatments (telehealth and self-completed online) for individuals with high-impact chronic pain, compared with usual care. Design, Setting, and Participants: This comparative effectiveness, 3-group, phase 3 randomized clinical trial enrolled 2331 eligible patients with high-impact chronic musculoskeletal pain from 4 geographically diverse health care systems in the US from January 2021 through February 2023. Follow-up concluded in April 2024. Interventions: Participants were randomized 1:1:1 to 1 of 2 remote, 8-session, CBT-based skills training treatments: health coach-led via telephone/videoconferencing (health coach; n = 778) or online self-completed program (painTRAINER; n = 776); or to usual care plus a resource guide (n = 777). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was attaining or exceeding the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in pain severity score (≥30% decrease; score range, 0-10) on the 11-item Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form from baseline to 3 months; 6 and 12 months from baseline were secondary time points. Secondary outcomes at 3, 6, and 12 months included pain intensity, pain-related interference, PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) social role and physical functioning; and patient global impression of change. Results: Among 2331 eligible randomized individuals (mean age, 58.8 [SD, 14.3] years; 1712 [74%] women; 1030 [44%] rural/medically underserved), 2210 (94.8%) completed the trial. At 3 months, the adjusted percentage of participants achieving 30% or greater decrease in pain severity score was 32.0 (95% CI, 29.3-35.0) in the health coach group, 26.6 (95% CI, 23.4-30.2) in the painTRAINER group, and 20.8 (95% CI, 18.0-24.0) in the usual care group. Both intervention groups were significantly more likely to attain an MCID in pain severity compared with control (health coach vs usual care: relative risk [RR], 1.54 [95% CI, 1.30-1.82]; painTRAINER vs usual care: RR, 1.28 [95% CI, 1.06-1.55]), and the health coach program was more effective than the online self-completed painTRAINER program (health coach vs painTRAINER: RR, 1.20 [95% CI, 1.03-1.40]). Statistically significant benefits were observed for both intervention groups vs usual care at 6 and 12 months after randomization for the pain severity outcomes and for other secondary pain and functioning outcomes. Conclusions and Relevance: Remote, scalable CBT-CP treatments (delivered either via telehealth or self-completed modules online) resulted in modest improvements in pain and related functional/quality-of-life outcomes compared with usual care among individuals with high-impact chronic pain. These lower-resource CBT-CP treatments could improve availability of evidence-based nonpharmacologic pain treatments within health care systems. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04523714.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.