Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40699523›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO2025

Inhibition of Cortical Evoked Responses to Sound Pulses by Preceding Silent Gaps.

Payam S Shabestari, Niklas K Edvall, Mikkel C Vinding, Sven Vanneste, Daniel Lundqvist, Patrick Neff, Christopher R Cederroth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Tinnitus.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Payam S ShabestariDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Niklas K EdvallLaboratory of Experimental Audiology, Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Mikkel C VindingNatMEG, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Sven VannesteLab for Clinical and Integrative Neuroscience, Trinity Institute for Neuroscience, School of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Daniel LundqvistNatMEG, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Patrick NeffDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Christopher R CederrothLaboratory of Experimental Audiology, Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden. christopher.cederroth@ki.se.

Funding

Karolinska Institutet KID
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe basic principle of sensorimotor gating (SMG) relies on the ability of a weak lead stimulus (such as a pre-pulse) to inhibit a startling effect of a following, more intense, abrupt stimulus-the so-called pre-pulse inhibition (PPI) paradigm. PPI has been used for near half a century as a means to investigate psychiatric disorders in which its disruption is a surrogate for altered SMG in schizophrenia. However, the blinking response is very variable, making it a poor outcome measure at the individual level. Unlike PPI, which is regulated in the lateral globus pallidus from the basal ganglia, inhibition of the startle reflex by preceding silent gaps embedded in continuous background noise is processed in the auditory cortex, making it particularly suitable for measuring cortical responses.

methodsHere, based on the behavioral gap-pre-pulse inhibition of acoustic startle (GPIAS) stemming from animal research in tinnitus research, we present a new sensory gating (SG) paradigm using source-localized magnetoencephalography (MEG) in 26 normal hearing healthy participants (13 females, 12 males, 1 other) with a mean age of 28.4 (SD

resultsWe evidence a near 72.5% (SD

conclusionOverall, we provide evidence that SG, measured by N1 cortical response to sound pulses, is reliably inhibited by preceding gaps. We propose this paradigm as an effective method to assess auditory SG through development and aging, and potentially as a method for the diagnosis of hearing disorders like tinnitus or hyperacusis.

Indexed as

Auditory CortexEvoked Potentials, AuditoryReflex, StartleSensory GatingAcoustic StimulationAdultFemaleHumansMagnetoencephalographyMalePrepulse InhibitionYoung AdultAuditoryCortical inhibitionEvoked responseGPIASMagnetoencephalography

Identifiers

PMID40699523
PMCPMC12528562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.