ArticleInfection2025
Identification and longitudinal assessment of sepsis phenotypes derived from routine clinical data in critically ill patients: a retrospective repeated measures latent profile analysis.
Article in Infection, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe definition of sepsis as an organ dysfunction with dysregulated host response leads to a considerable heterogeneity in this cohort of patients. Research is ongoing to identify subgroups of septic patients who share a common, potentially treatable pathomechanism. There are now several examples of reproducible subgroups, but they often rely on complex biomarker panels and data on their longitudinal stability are scarce, which limits their translation to the bedside. The objective of this study was to identify sepsis subgroups using routinely available clinical data and to assess the temporal stability of these subgroups.
methodsWe retrospectively collected data on all adult patients treated for sepsis according to sepsis-3 criteria in our intensive care unit at a university hospital in Germany between 2013 and 2021. Subgroup identification was performed using latent profile analysis, based on data collected within 48 h of the onset of their sepsis, and was repeated with data collected 120-144 h after onset. We assessed the stability of subgroup assignment over time and the in-hospital mortality of these subgroups.
resultsThe analysis included 637 patients with sepsis, 83% of whom were in septic shock. Latent profile analysis of clinical data from the first period identified four subgroups with a high median probability of class membership in all subgroups and distinct characteristics. Subgroup 1 included 76 patients (12%) and was characterized by a hepatobiliary and cardiovascular dysfunction. Subgroup 2, which included 242 patients (38%), showed the least inflammation and organ dysfunction. Subgroup 3 included 236 patients (37%) and was characterized by hyperinflammation. Subgroup 4 included 83 patients (13%) who were older and had more comorbidities. They tended to have high procalcitonin and INR levels. In-hospital mortality was excessive in Subgroup 1 and lowest in Subgroups 4 and 2. In the longitudinal assessment conducted at 120-144 h post-inclusion, subgroup 1 demonstrated the greatest stability over time.
conclusionAnalysis of clinical routine data identified four distinct clinical subgroups. In the longitudinal analysis, subgroup 1, which was characterized by hepatobiliary dysfunction and high mortality, demonstrated stability over the course of the illness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.