ArticleThe ultrasound journal2025
Contrast enhanced ultrasound - a useful method for diagnosing tubal ectopic pregnancy with low level β-HCG.
Article in The ultrasound journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn patients presenting with atypical symptoms or low plasma β-HCG levels, the presence of an adnexal mass without a yolk sac or embryo on ultrasound often provides insufficient confidence for a definitive diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy(EP). Consequently, most such cases can only be classified as suspected EP. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for tubal EP (tEP). We retrospectively analyzed 21 patients with suspected EP who underwent CEUS between August 2017 and August 2024. All patients had plasma β-HCG levels below 3500 mIU/mL. Among them, 20 underwent laparoscopic surgery, and all underwent curettage. The diagnostic performance of CEUS for tEP was assessed.
resultsA total of 21 patients were included: 19 with tEP, 1 with ovarian pregnancy, and 1 with intrauterine pregnancy. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) for diagnosing tubal dilation were 15.8%, 100%, and 23.8%, respectively. For CEUS, these values were 94.7%, 100%, and 95.2%, respectively. Statistically significant differences were observed between CEUS and TVUS in sensitivity and accuracy (P = 0.000). The enhancement pattern of villous tissue was categorized as either circular or non-circular. Among the tEP cases, 2 exhibited circular enhancement and 17 showed non-circular enhancement. Based on positive β-HCG, absence of an intrauterine gestational sac, and sonographic visualization of a dilated fallopian tube containing either circular or non-circular enhancement internally, CEUS demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy for tEP diagnosis in cases with low β-HCG levels. CEUS correctly diagnosed 18 of 19 tEP cases. One tEP case was diagnosed as a mass of uncertain significance. The intrauterine pregnancy case was misdiagnosed as an EP. The ovarian pregnancy case was diagnosed as EP, though CEUS indicated a relatively high possibility of ovarian origin.
conclusionIn conclusion, CEUS holds significant diagnostic value for tEP. It is particularly useful in diagnostically unclear cases and provides a more detailed assessment of the internal structure of adnexal masses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.