Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40699467›Full record

ArticleAnimal cognition2025

Classical cuts: a pilot study of classical music's effects on dogs in grooming settings.

Wanda Krupa, Piotr Czyżowski, Kamila Kaszycka, Mirosław Karpiński, Joanna Liszka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal cognition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Wanda KrupaDepartment of Animal Ethology and Wildlife Management, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Lublin, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0148-2115
Piotr CzyżowskiDepartment of Animal Ethology and Wildlife Management, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Lublin, Poland. piotr.czyzowski@up.lublin.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8587-246X
Kamila KaszyckaDepartment of Animal Ethology and Wildlife Management, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Lublin, Poland. kamila.kaszycka@up.lublin.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-3788-4959
Mirosław KarpińskiDepartment of Animal Ethology and Wildlife Management, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Lublin, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3325-4894
Joanna LiszkaDepartment of Animal Ethology and Wildlife Management, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Lublin, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Grooming procedures are often stressful for dogs due to exposure to loud noises, unfamiliar individuals, and the absence of their owners. This study aimed to assess whether classical music could reduce stress-related behaviours in dogs during grooming. Fifteen companion dogs of various breeds, aged 2 to 8 years, were observed during three grooming sessions: a control session without music, and two experimental sessions featuring classical piano compositions-Beethoven's Moonlight Sonata and Chopin's Nocturne. Music was played at 75 dB to mask ambient salon noise. Stress-related behaviours were rated on a 5-point scale during bathing, drying, clipping, and nail trimming. Results showed that all dogs, but especially males, exhibited significantly calmer behaviour in the music conditions. Female dogs showed similar trends, though differences were not statistically significant between stages. These findings suggest that classical music is a simple, effective, non-invasive enrichment method that can enhance dog welfare in grooming environments.

Indexed as

GroomingMusicAnimalsAnimal WelfareBehavior, AnimalDogsFemaleMalePilot ProjectsStress, PsychologicalDog groomingMusicStressWelfare

Identifiers

PMID40699467
PMCPMC12287177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.