ArticleJournal of community genetics2025
Age-specific uptake of non-invasive prenatal tests (NIPT) in Germany: a decision theory-based analysis.
Article in Journal of community genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for fetal chromosomal aberrations is an important component of healthcare systems worldwide, albeit with varying diagnostic coverage and conditions of use. In Germany, NIPT primarily focuses on trisomies 21, 18 and 13, for which the test costs are reimbursed by the statutory health insurance after thorough prior counseling. Despite this rather restrictive approach compared to other countries, concerns continue to be raised in Germany that young pregnant women, in particular, who are at a low risk of fetal aneuploidy, may have been overly encouraged to undergo NIPT. However, a decision theory-based analysis of the NIPT uptake figures in Germany suggests that there is currently no evidence that avoiding the birth of a trisomic child is a strong motivation particularly of younger women to take the test. Instead, the nation-wide NIPT uptake figures are exceptionally well in line with the corresponding age-specific prior risks. Notably, no such agreement was found when we considered the Netherlands as an example of a healthcare system where NIPT covers additional chromosomal aberrations without age-dependent risk. Replication of our analysis in other countries will reveal whether a strong consistency between age-specific prior risk and NIPT uptake is unique to Germany, or not.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.